协和控制、成就目标导向对自我管理团队成员创造力的非线性影响:一项本土情境下的研究被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要以32个团队、325名知识员工为研究对象,系统探讨了协和控制、成就目标导向及其交互效应对员工创造力的影响。结果表明:精熟-趋近目标导向和表现-趋近目标导向与员工创造力之间存在正相关关系,精熟-回避目标导向和表现-回避目标导向与员工创造力具有负相关关系;协和控制具有"两面性",既会对创造力产生倒"U"型影响,同时调节成就目标与创造力的关系。其中,高协和控制下,精熟-趋近导向以及表现-趋近导向对创造力具有倒"U"型影响。研究创造性地揭示了自我管理团队协和控制对员工创造力带来的"双刃剑效应",可为完善自我管理团队,提高创新效率提供理论启示与实践指导。

作者张昊民丁苗苗杨涛张艳

机构地区上海大学管理学院上海大学人力资源研究中心

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第22期133-140,共8页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(09YJA630091) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC630178)

关键词创造力协和控制成就目标导向跨层次非线性

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1BARKER J R. Tightening the iron cage..concertive control in self-managing teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarter- ly,1993,38(3) :408-437.
2CHEN G,MATHIEU J E. Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories: the roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008,106 ( 1 ) : 21- 38.
3HIRST G,VAN KNIPPENBERG D,ZHOU J. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: goal orientation, team learning behavior,and individual creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2) : 280-293.
4HIRST G,VAN KNIPPENBERG D,CHEN C,et al. How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? a cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orienta- tion-creativity relationships [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011,54(3) : 624-641.
5马君,张昊民,杨涛.成就目标导向、团队绩效控制对员工创造力的跨层次影响[J].心理学报,2015,47(1):79-92. 被引量：54
6DWECK C S, ELLIOTT E S. Achievement motivation [M]//MUSSEN P H, HETHERINGTON E M. Handbook of child psychology: social and personality development. New York:Wiley,1983 : 643-691.
7HIGGINS E T, RONEY C J, CROWE E, et al. Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance:distinct self- regulatory systems [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994,66 (2) : 276-286.
8ELLIOT A J. The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2006,30 ( 2 ) : 111 -116.
9JANSSEN O,VAN YPEREN N W. Employees'goal orien- tations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the out- comes of job performance and job satisfaetion[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(3) :368-384.
10AMABILE T M. The social psychology of creativity: a compo- nential conceptualization[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1983, 45(1) :357-376.

二级参考文献36

1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量：3723
2Winters,D,Latham,G.P.The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management . 1996
3Akerlof,George,Rachel,E Kranton.Identity and the economics of organizations. Journal of Economic Perspec-tives . 2005
4Waterman A S,Schwartz S J,Goldbacher E,et al.Predic-ting the subjective experience of intrinsic motivation:the roles of self-determination,the balance of challenges and skills,and self-realization values. Personality and Social Psy-chology Bulletin . 2003
5Suzy Wetlaufer.Who Wants to Manage a Millionaire. Harvard Business . 2000
6Paul E Levy,Jane R.Williams.The social context of performance appraisal:a review and framework for the future. Journal of Management . 2004
7Organ,D.W,Greene,C.N.The Effects of formalization on professional involvement:A compensatory process approach. Administrative Science Quarterly . 1981
8Paauwe,J,Boselie,P.HRM and performance:What‘s next. Human Resource Management . 2005
9Atkinson,J.W.Motives in fantasy,action and society. . 1958
10Drucker,P.The Age of Discontinuity;Guidelines to Our changing Society. . 1969