期刊文献+

论不可通约性与文化交流的三条途径 被引量:2

Incommensurability and Three Ways of Cultural Communication
下载PDF
导出
摘要 库恩将自己的"不可通约性"概念描述成"局部的"和一种不可翻译性,认为在不同群体间的交流事实上是完全可能的。库恩明确考虑了交流的两条道路,即解释和执双语。作者认为前两条道路与科学静态结构是相符的,而不可通约性中还有一条与科学动态结构相符的道路:辞典改变。当这一道路并非虚拟,当它扩展至文化交流时,可以在西学东渐中找到证明。 Thomas Kuhn described his"incommensurability"as a regional concept and a kind of untranslatability.Ac-tually,Kuhn agreed that the communication between different communities is possible,and he took the two ways of communication-interpretation and the bilingual-into consideration when discussing it.Here the author argues that the above-mentioned two ways are in accordance with the scientific static structure while a third way in line with sci-entific dynamic structure exists in"incommensurability"-lexicon change.Interestingly,the way of lexicon change is not virtualized,and can be proved during the eastward transmission of western sciences when it is expanded to cultural exchange.
作者 万丹
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第6期27-32,共6页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 不可通约性 交流 辞典改变 西学东渐 incommensurability communication lexicon change the eastward transmission of western sciences
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M],Chicago : University of Chicago Press ,2000.
  • 2“relativism,,词条:http://plato.Stanford, edu/entries/relativism/#Rel(2015 -09 -11)[2015 - 9 -20].
  • 3Kuhn T S. The structureof scientific revolutions[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago:Universityof Chicago Press, 1996 : 148~ 150.
  • 4DavidA. Wells, Well?s Principles and Appli-cations of Chemistry? Ivison, Blakemen,Talor Press,1858.
  • 5Sankey Howard. Epistemic relativism and the problemof the criterion[J]. Studies in History and Philosophyof Science?2011(42) : 562 - 570.
  • 6Kuhn T S. The road since structure[M]. Chicago:Uni-versity of Chicago Press,2000.
  • 7Kuhn T S. Reflections on my critics[A]//Criticism andthe Growth of Knowledge (vol. 4) [M]. Imre Lakatos,Alan E Musgrave,Eds. Cambridge : Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1970:231 - 278.
  • 8马醒初,李曙华.互补原理视域下的不可通约性——兼谈科学革命中的连续性[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,28(2):26-30. 被引量:1
  • 9Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M].3rd ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1996.
  • 10ZHONG Long一xi. The complexity of difference: indi-vidual, cultural, and cross - cutural[j], Interdivscipli-nary Science Reviews?2010(35) :341 - 352.

二级参考文献10

共引文献1

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部