摘要
《物权法》有关特殊动产所有权变动模式的规定存在交付与登记的关系不清、真正权利人和名义权利人的分离不利于交易安全、较难发挥登记对抗模式促进自由竞争和激励登记的功能等问题。对此,借鉴航空器和大型船舶登记生效模式较为可行,即仅对航空器和大型船舶适用登记制度,机动车和小型船舶适用一般动产所有权变动的规定。此模式能与我国动产和不动产适用的交付生效主义和登记生效主义的规定相一致,与其他民法制度相融合,同时能够克服现行模式的不足之处。
The regulations on ownership change pattern set by the Real Right Law of the People＇s Republic of China have some problems, for example, the relationship between delivery and registration is unclear,the seperation between real owners and nominal owners does harm to transaction security,and it is hard for the pattern of registration antagonism to promote free competition and registration. Considering these problems and international legislative comparisons,the author recommends that aircrafts and large-scale vessels＇ ownership change should be registered,and motor vehicles and small vessels apply to the regulations of general movables. This pattern could be consistent with the regulations of effectiveness upon delivery and effectiveness upon registration,and avoid the drawbacks of current legislative pattern.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第12期161-167,共7页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
《物权法》
特殊动产
所有权变动
立法模式
the Real Right Law
special movables
ownership change
legislative pattern
