摘要
针对我国特殊动产所有权变动的各种解释观点皆不圆满,其根源在于从公示要件主义下所有权唯一变动的法律理念解读登记对抗主义下生效要件与登记的效力关系。基于"登记对抗主义=生效要件(所有权变动)+登记(对抗优先效力)"立法构造,不宜将未登记产生的"不得对抗"的效力解释为买受人之间对所有权变动的"否定权",亦不宜认定交付只能发生一次完全的所有权变动,否则登记只能对受领交付的第一买受人具有意义。当特殊动产的买卖存在多重所有权变动的可能时,登记才有继而发生对抗优先效力的余地。
Tht various explanations to the change of special movable ownership in our country are all imperfect,because the legal relationship between the requirement of validity and registration under registration antagonism has been explained from the legal ideas that the change ofownership only happened under the doctrine that real right change must be notified in public. based on the legislative conformation that "the registration antagonism = the requirement of validity( the change of ownership) + registration( the priority of antagonism) ",it's not proper to explain that the ownership of special movable can't be changed before registration,for it just can't counter the third party at this time. Meanwhile,it's not proper to explain that delivery can only change the ownership fully for once,or registration can only make sense to the first buyer who have accepted the delivery. Only when the deal of special movable have the possibilities of multiple ownership change,will registration have the chance to apply the priority of antagonism.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期141-148,共8页
Legal Forum
关键词
登记对抗主义
所有权变动
特殊动产
registration antagonism
the change of ownership
special movable