期刊文献+

焦点技术观是本质主义技术观吗? 被引量:1

Is Focaltechnics a Kind of Substantive View of Technology?
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国技术哲学家阿尔伯特·鲍尔格曼在其代表作《技术与当代生活的特征:一种哲学的追问》中,将现有的技术观归纳为本质主义技术观、工具主义技术观和技术多元论,并提出了以"设备范式"、"焦点物"和"焦点实践"为核心的焦点技术观。美国南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校的拉里·希克曼则认为鲍尔格曼的焦点技术观实质上是一种本质主义技术观,并对其进行了批判。本文将阐明焦点技术观并不是传统意义上的本质主义技术观,而是对本质主义技术观的吸收和超越。这种超越使得对技术的改革和合理应用成为可能。 In the book Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophy lnquiry, Albert Borgmann, the American philosopher of technology, classifies the existing views of technology into three types: the substantive, the instrumentalist, and the pluralist views of technology. He puts forward the focaltechnics which takes device paradigm, focal things and focal practices as centers. Larry Hickman criticizes that Borgmann's focal view of technology is essentially the substantive one. This paper intends to elucidate that Borgmann's view of technology is not the traditional substantive one, but a kind of absorption and transcendence of the substantive view of technology, which makes the reform and rational apply of technology possible.
作者 董晓菊 邱慧
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期147-152,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 "科学实践哲学与地方性知识研究"(项目批准号:13&ZD068)
关键词 鲍尔格曼 焦点技术观 本质主义技术观 技术改革 Albert Borgmann Focaltechnics Substantive view of technology Reform of technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Hickman, L. A. 'Technology, Final Structures, and Focal Things' [J]. Review of Technology and the Contemporary Life: A Philosophical lnquiry, by Borgmann, Albert, Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1992, (12): 337-345.
  • 2Hickman, L. A. 'Focaltechnics, Pragmatechnics, and the Reform of Technology' [A]. Higgs, E., Light, A., Strong, D.(Eds) Technology and the Good Life? [C], Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 2000, 89-105.
  • 3Borgmann, A. Technology and the Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry[M], Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
  • 4阿尔伯特·鲍尔格曼:设备范式与焦点物[A],邱慧译,吴国盛编:技术哲学经典读本[M],上海:上海交通大学出版社,2008,409-432.
  • 5Borgmarm, A. 'Reply to Larry Hickman' [J]. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1992, (12): 345-47.
  • 6Borgmann, A. 'The Good Life and Appropriate Technology' [J]. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 1983, (6): 11-19.
  • 7Higgs, E., Light, A., Strong, D. 'Introduction' [A]. Higgs, E., Light, A., Strong, D.(Eds) Technology and the Good Life? EC], Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, 1-15.
  • 8Durbin, P. 'Albert Borgmann and a Philosophy of Technology?' [J]. Technd: Research in Philosophy and Technology, Special Issue: Philosophy of Technology in Search of Discourse Synthesis, 2006, 10(2): 168-176.
  • 9Brey, P. 'Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn' [J]. Techng: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2010, 14(1): 36-48.
  • 10Feenberg, A. 'From Essentialism to Constructivism: Philosophy of Technology at the Crossroads' [A]. Higgs, E., Light, A., Strong, D.(Eds) Technology and the Good Life? [C], Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, 294-315.

同被引文献39

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部