期刊文献+

宝安区不同年龄健康成人血浆D-二聚体生物参考区间的建立 被引量:3

Establishment of biological reference intervals of plasma D-dimer for healthy adults of different ages in Bao′an District
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立宝安区不同年龄健康成人血浆D-二聚体生物参考区间,为临床诊断和治疗提供更科学、更有价值的参考依据。方法选取2014年6月至2015年1月深圳市宝安区松岗人民医院体检科不同年龄健康成人共1 156例,其中男417例,女739例。按年龄分为18-50岁、〉50-60岁、〉60岁3组。采用Sysmex CA1500全自动凝血分析仪免疫比浊法检测血浆D-二聚体水平,采用SPSS19.0软件对数据进行统计分析,血浆D-二聚体水平呈偏态分布,采用百分位数(P95)表示参考区间的单侧上限,确定相应的生物参考区间。并分析比较不同年龄和不同性别之间血浆D-二聚体水平之间的差异。结果同年龄组男性和女性D-二聚体水平比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.372-1.092,P〉0.05);18-50岁和大于50-60岁组比较,血浆D-二聚体水平之间差异无统计学意义(t=0.954,P〉0.05),〉60岁组与其他两组比较,血浆D-二聚体水平之间差异有统计学意义(t=5.972,P〈0.05);18-60岁D-二聚体正常参考区间为0-225mg/L;〉60岁D-二聚体正常参考区间为0-297mg/L。结论血浆D-二聚体水平与性别无关,与年龄有关,随年龄增高D-二聚体水平呈上升趋势。不同人群、不同仪器使用配套试剂应建立自己的正常值参考区间。 Objective To establish the biological reference intervals of plasma D-dimer for healthy adults of different ages in Bao′an District,so as to provide more scientific and valuable reference for diagnosis and treatment in clinic.Methods 1 156 healthy adults of different ages were selected in Department of Medical Examination,Songgang People′s Hospital of Bao′an District,from June 2014 to January 2015,there were 417 males and 739 females among which.According to their ages,these healthy adults were divided into three groups:18-50 years old group,〉50-60 years old group and 〉60 years old group.Plasma D-dimer was detected by immune turbidimetric method on Sysmex CA1500 automatic blood coagulation analyzer.SPSS19.0software was used for the statistic analysis of the results.The unilateral upper limit of D-dimer reference interval was represented by percentile(P95),since the detection results of D-dimer was skewed distribution.The appropriate biological reference intervals were determined,and the differences of D-dimer levels among adults of different ages and different genders were analyzed and compared.Results In the same age group,there was no significantly difference of the D-dimer level between males and females(t=0.372-1.092,P〉0.05).There was no significant difference of the D-dimer level between 18-50 years old group and 〉50-60 years old group(t=0.954,P〉0.05).The D-dimer level of 〉60 years old group was significantly different from another two age groups(t=5.972,P〈0.05).The reference intervals of healthy adults of 18-60 years old and 〉60 years old were 0-225 and 0-297mg/L,respectively.Conclusion The plasma D-dimer level was age-related,which was not associated with gender.The D-dimer level inceased with age.The appropriate biological reference intervals of D-dimer should be established,when the detection objects,instruments and detection reagents were different.
作者 姚伟 房笃智
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2015年第23期3477-3478,3481,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
基金 广东省深圳市宝安区科技局基金资助项目(2014051)
关键词 健康成人 血浆D-二聚体 免疫比浊法 参考区间 healthy adults plasma D-dimer immune turbidimetry reference interval
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber TL, et al. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. A shortcut to accurate diagnosis? [J], Arch Intern Med, 1996,156(9):939-946.
  • 2[2]Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004,140(8):589-602.
  • 3[3]Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users'guides to the medical literature. Ⅲ. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group[J]. JAMA, 1994,271(9):703-707.
  • 4[4]Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, et al. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999,160(3):1043-1066.
  • 5[5]Gould MK. Review: of the various D-dimer assays, negative ELISA results are most useful for excluding a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism [J]. ACP J Club, 2004,141(3):77.
  • 6[6]Bates SM, Kearon C, Crowther M, et al. A diagnostic strategy involving a quantitative latex D-dimer assay reliably excludes deep venous thrombosis [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003,138(10):787-794.
  • 7[7]Kruip M J, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, et al. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003,138(12):941-951.
  • 8[8]Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators[J]. JAMA, 1990,263(20):2753-2759.
  • 9[9]Brown MD, Rowe BH, Reeves M J, et al. The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis[J].Ann Emerg Med, 2002,40(2):133-144.
  • 10[10]Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T, et al. Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test[J]. Am J Med,2002,113(8):630-635.

共引文献128

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部