期刊文献+

不同部位切口在阑尾炎微创手术患者中的疗效 被引量:1

Clinical effects of different incision positions on minimally invasive surgery in patients with appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较采取不同部位切口进行阑尾炎微创手术的疗效。方法选取2013年7月至2014年7月重庆市双桥经济技术开发区人民医院收治的阑尾炎患者100例,按照完全抽样调查法1∶1分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。观察组行经脐切口微创手术,对照组行经脐周切口微创手术,分析比较两组患者临床疗效。结果两组患者治疗后手术时间、引流管放置率和术中出血量等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者切口外观与愈合满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阑尾炎患者行经脐切口与经脐周切口微创手术的安全性和实用性效果相当,但经脐切口术的外观与愈合满意度相对较高。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of different incision positions on appendicitis minimally invasive surgery.Methods 100 cases of patients with appendicitis were selected in People′s Hospital of Shuangqiao Economic and Technological Development Zone from July 2013 to July 2014,and divided into observation group(50cases)and control group(50cases)according to complete sample survey in accordance with the proportion of 1∶1.Observation group and control group were received minimally invasive surgeries respectively via intraumbilical incision and periumbilical incision.The clinical effects of the two groups were analyzed and compared.Results There was no difference of postoperative treatment time,drainage tube placement rate,amount of bleeding between the two groups(P〉0.05).The cosmetic appearance and healing satisfaction of observation group were significantly higher than control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion The safety and effect of intraumbilical incision in appendicitis minimally invasive surgery are the same as periumbilical incision,however,the cosmetic appearance and healing satisfaction of intraumbilical incision are better than periumbilical incision.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2015年第23期3534-3535,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 急性阑尾炎 切口 微创手术 疗效 appendicitis incision minimally invasive surgery clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献60

  • 1郑灵芝,陈彬彬,诸溢扬,邵秀娟.老年妇科腹腔镜手术的临床应用[J].实用老年医学,2006,20(4):273-274. 被引量:20
  • 2邱磊,谢沛标,廖健南,周爱华,廖一平.老年急性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的对比分析[J].实用老年医学,2007,21(2):116-117. 被引量:15
  • 3周永吕,郭万学.超声医学[M].4版.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002:2040.
  • 4吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003,8.900.
  • 5谢桂生,韦涌初.麦氏小切口阑尾切除术452例体会[J].微创医学,2007,2(5):420-422. 被引量:14
  • 6赵芝祥.腹腔镜与腹部小切口手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床比较分析[J].北方医药,2011,8(6) :44-45.
  • 7Holder - Murray J, Zoccali M, Hurst RD, et al. Totally laparoscopic total proetoeolectomy: a safe alternative to open surgery in inflammatory bowel disease [J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2012, 18 (5) : 863 -868.
  • 8Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, et al. Laparoscopic right hepatecto- my: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2011, 202 (5) : e52 -e58.
  • 9Zollinger RM, Ellison EC. Zollinger's atlas of surgical operations [ M]. 9th ed. New York: McGraw - Hill Medical, 2011 : 150 - 153.
  • 10Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy : a retrospective comparative analysis [ J ]. SurgEndosc, 2010, 24 (10): 2567-2574.

共引文献62

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部