期刊文献+

产程中枕横位和枕后位的胎头机转临床研究 被引量:13

Anterior rotation in occiput transverse and occiput posterior positions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察以枕横位或枕后位衔接的胎头在产程中向枕前位自然旋转的规律,为徒手旋转胎头时机的选择提供依据.方法 2014年4月至2014年12月住院待产,宫口扩张至3 cm前阴道检查确认胎头为枕横位或枕后位、记录每次阴道检查的胎方位、宫口扩张、先露高位,以最终阴道顺产的1 013例单胎足月分娩产妇为研究对象.以产程中首次发现胎方位转为枕前位时的宫口大小和先露高低作为观察指标,宫口自扩张4 cm始每扩张2 cm作为1层分4层:4~5 cm、6~7 cm、8~9 cm、10 cm,先露自坐骨棘上2 cm(S-2)始每下降1 cm作为1层分5层:S-1、S0、S+1、S+2、S+3.分析产妇枕横位和枕后位的胎头自然旋转率、胎头机转、胎头旋转率与宫口扩张大小和先露下降水平的关系.结果 临产时枕横位850例,枕后位407例,自然转为枕前位的比例分别为82.5% (701/850)和76.7%(312/407).枕横位和枕后位胎头旋转的构成比在不同宫口扩张大小间差异有统计学意义(x2 =260.93,P<0.01).枕横位和枕后位胎头旋转的构成比在不同先露下降水平间差异有统计学意义(x2=133.18,P<0.01).有利于枕横位自发旋转至枕前位的因素包括宫口扩张6~7cm(OR =5.81,95% CI:3.81~8.87)、8~9 cm(OR =4.99,95% CI:3.19~7.83),先露下降至S+1(OR =3.01,95% CI:1.99 ~4.54)、S+2(OR =5.43,95% CI:3.53 ~8.35).有利于枕后位自发旋转至枕前位的因素为宫口扩张6~7 cm(OR =4.11,95%CI:2.24~7.89)、8~9 cm(OR =27.31,95% CI:15.12 ~49.34)、10 cm(OR =27.76,95% CI:14.87 ~51.82),先露下降至S+2(OR =4.84,95% CI:3.03~7.73).结论 产程中以枕横位或枕后位衔接的胎头,自发旋转至枕前位的时机有所不同.宫口扩张6~9 cm、胎先露下降至S+1 ~S+2有利于枕横位自发旋转至枕前位;宫口扩张6~10 cm、胎先露下降至S+2有利于枕后位自发旋转至枕前位.掌握其胎头自发旋转的规律,既可提高徒手旋转胎头的成功率,又能降低头位难产率. Objective To investigate the natural rotation of the fetal head during labor when it was engaged by occiput transverse (OT) or occiput posterior(OP) positions.Methods A total of 1 013 parturients was included who had a singleton term gestation, vertex presentation, OT or OP position with cervical dilatation of ≤ 3 cm, and vaginal delivery.All parturients were delivered in Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine during April 1 to December 31,2014.Cervical dilation, station, and fetal position of every delivery were systematically recorded.Main outcome was the cervical dilation and station of anterior rotation from OT or OP position.They were Stratified by cervical dilation every 2 cm since 4 cm into 4 ~ 5 cm, 6 ~7 cm, 8 ~9 cm, 10 cm;or were stratified by fetal head station every 1 cm since-2 (S-2) into S-1 , S0, S+1 , S+2 , S+3.The differences in anterior rotation rate, dilatation, and head station between OT and OP were analyzed.Results There were 850 OT and 407 OP with cervical dilatation of ≤≤ 3 cm.The rate of anterior rotation was 82.5 % (701/850) and 76.7 % (312/407), respectively.The constituent ratio of OT rotating into occiput anterior position (OA) at different dilatation was different with that of OP (x2 =260.93, P 〈 0.01).The constituent ratio of OT rotating into OA at different fetal head station was different with that of OP (x2 =133.18, P 〈0.01).The cervical dilatation and fetal head station that make it easy for OT 's anterior rotation were 6 ~7 cm (OR =5.81 , 95% CI :3.81 ~8.87), 8 ~9 cm(OR =4.99 ,95% CI:3.19 ~7.83), and S+1(OR =3.01, 95% CI: 1.99 ~4.54), S+2(OR =5.43, 95% CI:3.53 ~ 8.35).The cervical dilatation and fetal head station that make it easy for OP 's anterior rotation were 6~7 cm(OR =4.11,95% CI :2.24 ~7.89), 8 ~9 cm(OR =27.31, 95% CI :15.12 ~49.34), 10 cm(OR =27.76 , 95% CI :14.87 ~51.82), S+2(OR =4.84 , 95% CI :3.03 ~7.73).Conclusions The anterior rotation time of OT is different from OP.It's easy for OT to rotate into OA when cervix dilate into 6 ~9 cm and fetal head station is at S+1 ~ S+2.When cervix dilate into 6 ~ 10 cm and fetal head station is at S+2, it's easy for OP to rotate into OA.
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2015年第11期1682-1685,共4页 Journal of Chinese Physician
关键词 分娩过程 胎位不正 倒转术 胎位 Labor,obstetric ABNORMAL FETAL POSITIONS Version,fetal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 2魏碧蓉.高级助产学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:69-74.
  • 3Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) :490-499.
  • 4侯磊,李光辉,邹丽颖,李长东,陈奕,阮焱,王欣,贾朝霞,张为远.全国剖宫产率及剖宫产指征构成比调查的多中心研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,0(10):728-735. 被引量:482
  • 5章小维,杨慧霞.头位难产识别与处理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2012,28(2):85-87. 被引量:12
  • 6凌萝达,顾美礼主编.难产[M].2版.重庆:重庆出版社,2001:334-336.
  • 7Sen K, Sakamoto H, Nakabayashi Y, et al . Management of the occiput posterior presentation : a single institute experience [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2013,39 ( 1 ) : 160-165.
  • 8Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, et al. Manual rotation to re- duce caesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2011,24 (1) :65-72.
  • 9符凤晖,钟宜.剖宫产与低位产钳术对母婴预后影响的临床观察[J].中国医师杂志,2014,16(7):951-953. 被引量:6
  • 10易翠兰,种翠宁,郭剑影.手转胎头适宜时机的临床观察[J].实用妇产科杂志,2011,27(11):863-865. 被引量:16

二级参考文献52

  • 1章小维,郭明彩,杨慧霞.高龄初产对妊娠结局的影响[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(2):111-112. 被引量:161
  • 2汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:8
  • 3周敏,章小维,渠川琰,兰红霞,陈奕,黄醒华,李智,冯清燕,陈咏玫.妊娠期适宜增重范围与出生体重的关系研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(4):275-277. 被引量:78
  • 4刘晓霞 李淑杏 屈晓丹.头位难产手转胎头的时机探讨.实用医技杂志,2007,14(19):2698-2699.
  • 5ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 218, December 1995. Dysto- cia and the augmentation of labor. 1995.
  • 6Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, et al. Williams Obstetrics [M]. 23rd ed. New York, N. Y. : The McGraw-Hill Compa- nies,2010 : 544-564.6.
  • 7Friedman EA. Primigravia labor agraphicostatistical analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1955,6:567-589.
  • 8Zhang J, Troendle J, Yanccy MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002 ,187 :824- 828.
  • 9Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R,et al. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor [ J ]. OG, 2010,115 : 705-710.
  • 10Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes [ J ]. OG, 2010,116 : 1281-1287.

共引文献1784

同被引文献84

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部