浅析医疗损害鉴定模式的统一

Analysis about the normalization of medical damage appraisement

由于我国对医疗损害鉴定机制的立法尚未出台,饱受争议的"二元化"鉴定问题长期存在,医学会与司法鉴定机构共同开展医疗损害鉴定。因为立场和鉴定人资质的不同,时常会出现对同一案件作出的鉴定结论大相径庭,导致案件审理不公,加深了医患矛盾、加重了社会经济负担。本文着重探讨几条使医疗损害鉴定二分归一的可行途径,以期维护和谐医患关系及保证司法公正。

As the legislation for the mechanism of medical damage appraisement is still not clear,the controversial binary appraisement has existed for a long time in China.Both medical association and forensic institution make the appraisement mechanism parallel.Due to the different position and qualification,the appraisal conclusions of the same case are often divergent.It may lead to unfair trial,deepen the doctor-patient conflicts and increase social economic burden.We probe into some feasible ways to unitize the two different medical damage appraisements,in order to maintain a harmonious doctors-patient relationship and to ensure judicial justice.