期刊文献+

红十字会应急救护培训联动管理的定位、边界与模式 被引量:7

The Orientation, Boundary and Model of the Emergency Rescue Training Linkage Management of the Red Cross
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应急救护培训是世界各国红十字会组织的强项,群众性应急救护培训的普及也是红十字会的法定职责。在我国社会转型以及风险社会的背景下,红十字会在应急救护培训联动管理中应当发挥主体性作用,为此,需要加强联动管理。作为一个开放性的生态系统,应急救护培训联动管理在构建及资源整合的过程中需确立自身的技术边界与社会边界,根据应急救护培训的资金支持与授权以及应急救护培训工作的行动提供这两条标准,红十字会应急救护培训可确立若干不同的联动管理模式。 Emergency rescue training is the Red Cross organization's strength in all countries. Popularizing mass participation's rescue training is the statutory duty of the Red Cross Society. Under the background of social transformation as well as risk society in our country, the Red Cross Society should play a principle role in the emergency rescue training linkage management. For this, we need to strengthen the linkage management. As an open ecosystem, the emergency rescue training linkage management ought to establish its own technical boundary and social boundary in the process of contraction and resource conformity. According to the financing, authorizing and the actual delivery of the emergency rescue training, the Red Cross Society can establish different linkage management models.
作者 刘蔚 高秀文
出处 《社会建设》 2015年第2期87-96,共10页 Social Construction
关键词 红十字会 应急救护培训 联动管理 开放性生态系统 emergency rescue training of the Red Cross Society linkage management open ecosystem
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Dennis R Young. Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: theoretical and international perspectives[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2000,29 ( 1 ) : 149 - 172.
  • 2Weisbrod B A. Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in three-sector economy[A]. In E S Phelps(eds). Altruism morality and economic theory [C]. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 1974: 171- 195.
  • 3Hansmann, Henry. The role of nonprofit enterprise [J]. Yale Law Journal, 1980,89:835-901.
  • 4Salamon L M. Rethinking public management : third-party government and the changing forms of government action[J]. Public Policy, 1981,29(3) : 255-275.
  • 5Jennifer M Brinkerhoff and Derich W Brinkerhoff. Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: evolution,themes and new directions[J]. Public Administration and Development, 2002,22: 3- 18.
  • 6Wuthnow, R The voluntary sector: legacy of the past, hope for the future? [A]. In Robert Wuthnow (ed.). Between states and markets: the voluntary sector in comparative perspective[C]. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1991:3- 29.
  • 7Gidron B, Kramer R M and Salamon L M. Government and the third sector in comparative perspective: allies or adversaries? [A]. In Gidron B, Kramer R, Salamon L M (eds). Government and the third sector: emerging relationships in welfare states[C]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992:1- 14.
  • 8Coston. A model and typology of government-nonprofit organization relationship[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1998, 27(3):358-382.
  • 9Adil Najam. The four-Cs of third sector-government relations: cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-optation[J]. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 2000,10(4) : 375-391.
  • 10田凯.西方非营利组织理论述评[J].中国行政管理,2003(6):59-64. 被引量:114

共引文献16

同被引文献26

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部