美国电影《十二怒汉》中合理怀疑的逻辑分析

Logical Analysis of the Reasonable Doubt in American Film "Twelve Angry Men"

用新逻辑形式对美国电影《十二怒汉》所作的逻辑分析,重点是对证据真假的判断。生活经验是对证据进行真假判断的唯一源泉,用生活经验去衡量具体证据时,如果穷尽各种方法都未能发现证据违反生活经验,这就是"无合理怀疑"。对一份证据没有产生合理怀疑,就认定这份证据为真,反之,如果发现证据违反生活经验,这就是"合理怀疑"。对一份证据产生了合理怀疑,就应认定这份证据为假。对电影《十二怒汉》所作的逻辑分析,可以作为法律逻辑学研究的经典素材。

Applying a new logical form to analyzing the American Film ＂Twelve Angry Men＂, this paper aims to judge whether the evidence is true or false. Experience of life is the only source helps to distinguish the false evidence from the true evidence. When judging specific evidence on the basis of life experience, it is called ＂unreasonable doubt＂ if no evidence is found to have violated life experience although all methods have been used. Namely, since there＇s no reasonable doubt about the evidence, the evidence is true. On the contrary, if the evidence has been found to have violated the life experience, this is ＂reasonable doubt＂, and the evidence should be judged as false. The logical analysis of ＂Twelve Angry Men＂ can be, used as a typical material for the studies of legal logic.