期刊文献+

突变论视域下福柯的权力结构分析 被引量:1

The Analysis of Foucault's Power Structures in the Catastrophe Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 福柯的权力谱系学描述的是16-19世纪西方社会权力结构的线性关系向非线性关系转变的历史画面,其后德勒兹提出的统治型权力、禁锢型权力和控制型权力的历史传承又为权力谱系学填充了时代性背景,如何在今天复杂性科学蓬勃发展的时代背景下为权力谱系学阐明新的含义?突变论中的尖顶突变模型既能够有效地解释权力结构的突变过程,还能够赋予权力结构若干复杂性特征:双模态、不可达性、发散性、突跳性、滞后性、多径性、脆性。与福柯和德勒兹的权力论相比较,系统动力学构造的数学模型能够历时性地描述一种权力结构发生和演化过程,以及三种权力结构相互转化、突变与渐变的过程,为人类理解权力结构的演变提供了最为重要的一个维度:时间。 Foucault's genealogy of power described the historical pictures which is the great change from the linear relationship to the non-linear relationship of the power structure of the Western society during the 16th-19 th century,and then the historical heritage of the authority power,the imprison power and the control power filled the times by Deleuze.But how can we give the new meaning to the power genealogy in the background of the flourish of the complex science?The model of the cusp catastrophe in the catastrophe theory can not only effectively explain the sudden change in the power structure,but also endow the complexity of the structure with a number of features:dualmode,no accessibility,divergence,jumps,hysteresis,multipath,and brittleness.Compared with the power of Foucault and Deleuze's theory,the mathematical model of the system dynamics can depict the evolution of the power structure,as well as the mutation and gradual process of the three,and it provides the most important dimension of the understanding the evolution of the power structure by human being:time.
作者 黄磊
出处 《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第6期65-71,共7页 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 突变论 权力谱系学 知识考古学 自我伦理学 Catastrophe Theory genealogy of power archaeology of knowledge self ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[法]米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999.
  • 2[法]米歇尔·福柯.古典时代疯狂史[M].林志明,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005:219.
  • 3[法]德勒兹.哲学与权力的谈判-德勒兹访谈录[M].刘汉全译,北京:商务印书馆,2000.
  • 4[法]勒内·托姆.突变论:思想和应用[M].周仲良,译.上海:译文出版社,1989:110-125.
  • 5闫莹,李敏强.组织演化的复杂性研究[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2010,9(4):62-67. 被引量:4
  • 6[美]帕森斯.现代社会的结构与过程[M].北京:光明日报出版社,1988.141.
  • 7[德]马克斯·韦伯著.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1987..
  • 8FOUCAULT M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Inter- views and Other Writings, 1972 -- 1977 [M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980 : 145.
  • 9[美]阿诺德·戴维森.福柯,谱系学,伦理学[M].迟庆利,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,2002:205.
  • 10季国清,刘啸霆.网络研究平台的历史建构[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2002,23(9):1-10. 被引量:2

二级参考文献7

  • 1STACEY R D. The Science of Complexity: An Alterative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes [J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16 (6): 477 - 495.
  • 2Ichak Adizes. Organizational Passages: Diagnosing and Treating Life Cycle Problems of Organizations[ J ]. Organizational Dynamics, 1979,8 ( 1 ) : 3 - 25.
  • 3Tushman M L, Anderson P. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments[J ]. Administrative Science, 1986, 31:439-465.
  • 4Stacey R D, Griffin D, Shaw P. Complexity and Management: Fad Or Radical Challenge To Systems Thinking[M]. London : Routledge, 2002.
  • 5Bak P, Chen K. Self-Organized Criticality[J]. Scientific American, 1991, 264 (1) : 46 - 53.
  • 6[法]吉尔·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze) 著,刘汉全.哲学与权力的谈判[M]商务印书馆,2000.
  • 7谭跃进,邓宏钟.复杂适应系统理论及其应用研究[J].系统工程,2001,19(5):1-6. 被引量:161

共引文献145

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部