期刊文献+

基于DS-TE技术的VPN的LSP抢占算法

Preempting Algorithm of LSP in VPN Based on DS-TE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对BH-PREPT(Bandwidth Preemption)算法因只关心最小化带宽浪费,而不考虑计算复杂度和当前光纤通信的带宽资源而引起的网络时延极大增加的问题,提出了改进算法——DH-PREPT(Delay and Bandwidth Preemption)。将用户业务的优先级和网络时延放在首位,通过采用多个LSP(Label Switching Paths)绑定转发等价类和快速转发客户常用优先级业务的方法提高算法的时延性能。实验结果表明,该算法在保证带宽利用率的前提下,极大地减少了网络中的时延。当网络中发生抢占时,该算法在减少网络时延方面的性能优于BH-PREPT算法,提高了网络的Qo S(Quality of Service)保障能力。 The BH-PREPT( Bandwidth Preemption) algorithm only concerns with minimizing the waste of bandwidth without considering the computational complexity and the current development of optical fiber communication,leading to excessive increase of delay in the networks. An algorithm greatly reducing the delay of the networks,named DH-PREPT( Delay and Bandwidth Preemption) is proposed. The DH-PREPT algorithm makes the computational complexity lower under the premise of minimizing the utilization rate of bandwidth. It considers the delay indicator by the bound of forwarding equivalence class and LSPs( Label Switching Paths) and fast forward the data of custom. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms the BH-PREPT algorithm when preemption occurs in the network.
出处 《吉林大学学报(信息科学版)》 CAS 2015年第6期615-619,共5页 Journal of Jilin University(Information Science Edition)
基金 长春市重大科技攻关计划基金资助项目(3D5143485420)
关键词 区分服务 流量工程 抢占算法 标签交换路径 differentiated services traffic engineering preemption algorithm label switching path
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1le Faucheur F, Lai W. RFC 3564 Requirements for support of differentiated services-aware MPLS traffic engineerirng[ S]. IETF, 2003.
  • 2Blake S, Black D, Carlson M, et al. RFI2 2475 An architecture for differentiated services[S]. IETF, 1998.
  • 3Awduche D, Malcolm J, Agogbua J, et al. RFC 2702 Requirements for traffic engineering over MPLS[S]. IETF, 1999.
  • 4de Oliveira J, Vasseur J P, Chen L, et al. RFC 4829 Label switched path (LSP) preemption policies for MPLS traffic engineering[S]. IETF, 2007.
  • 5Peyravian M, Kshemkalyani A D. Connection preemption: issues, algorithm.s, and a simulation study[ C]//INFOCOM' 97. Sixteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Kobe: IEEE Comp Soe, 1997 : 143 - 151.
  • 6de Oliveira J C, Scoglio C, Akyildiz I F, et al. New preemption policies For DiFfServ-aware traffic engineering to minimize rerouting in MPLS networks [J ]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Netzoorking, 2004,12(4) : 733 - 745.
  • 7Ahman I, Kamruzzaman J, Aswathanarayaniah S. An improved preemption policy for higher user satisfaction[C] // 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. Taipei, 2005 : 749 - 754.
  • 8Zhu M Y, He X M, Ye W. Minimizing preemption cost for DiffServ-aware MPLS traffic engineering [ C] // 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking. Beijing, 2006 : 1 5.
  • 9Jamoussi B, Andersson L, Callon R, et al. RFC 3212 Constraint-based LSP setup using LDP[S]. IETF, 2002.
  • 10Awduche D, Berger L, Li T, et al. RFC 3209 RSVP-TE: extensions to RSVP for LSP tunnels[S]. IETF, 2005.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部