古突厥文碑铭中ik刍议

On the Word ik in the Old Turkic Inscriptions

文章以语言历史学派理论为基础,对比了汉文、古代突厥文、古藏文、和阗塞文历史记载,论述了不同语言文献对ik族属和来源的记述,认为ik不是ikil、Kiuk、t■ǐak、Kirkut,而是Km ik;在752年被回纥征服后,其部分迁至漠北、部分迁至焉耆、部分留居原地成为乃蛮的一部。

Applying the theories of the linguistic historic school, this paper comparing the documents in Chinese, Old Turkic, Old Tibet, Khotan Saka and discussing the records of the nationality and origin concerning the word Cik, held that Cik was not the same as the words of Cikil, Kiuk, tciak, or Kirkut that the word Kiam Cik. Part of Cik people had moved to the North of the Desert, part to Arkni, and the rest stayed to become part of Naiman in the Kam River after being conquered by the Uyghur in 752.