摘要
20世纪五六十年代的中国当代美学的"美学大讨论",是中国当代美学发展史上的一座丰碑:它确立了中国美学史上的独立学科,为中国当代美学的发展奠定了基础;它形成了中国当代美学史上的"四大流派",并为实践美学成为中国当代美学主导流派做了铺垫;它为中国当代美学打通"中、西、马"的中国特色定下了基调,逐步形成了马克思主义美学的中国形态。在"美学大讨论"中朱光潜先生是一个关键人物,他的美学思想是"主客观统一论",而且是与时俱进的、坚持马列第一义的、中西融合的"主客观统一论"。当然,"美学大讨论"及其朱光潜先生,都不可避免地具有时代的局限性,诸如学术政治化、"大批判"文风、教条主义倾向,这都是发展中国当代美学应该反思的教训。
In the twentieth Century 50- 60's Chinese contemporary aesthetics great Aesthetic discussion half a century has passed. This is a great discussion of aesthetics,for me is a academic beacon: it let me know and love the aesthetics,also let me clear up the Marx philosophy basic aesthetics,it led me to read many of the aesthetic works at all times and in all countries; thus,I finally took aesthetic research academic road. This is a great discussion of aesthetics,is a monument in the history of the development of Chinese Contemporary Aesthetics: it established the independent subject of the history of Chinese aesthetics,has laid the foundation for the development of Chinese contemporary aesthetics; it forms of contemporary Chinese aesthetics history four schools,and become the leading Chinese contemporary aesthetics school has made the upholstery for the practice of the United States;set the tone it through China,West,Marxism as the Chinese contemporary aesthetics with Chinese characteristics,and gradually formed the Marx's aesthetics of Chinese morphology. In the great discussion of aesthetics,Mr. Zhu Guangqian is a key figure,his aesthetic ideas,no matter from his own paper,or academic history word,should be subjective unification theory,and is in keeping with the times,adhere to the Marxist Leninist first righteousness,the fusion of Chinese and Western subjective unification theory. Of course,the great discussion of aesthetics and Mr. Zhu Guangqian,with its limitations such as age,academic politics,great criticism style,dogmatism,are the development of Chinese contemporary aesthetics should reflect on the lessons and reaction. Great Aesthetic Discussion should be the eternal memory of aesthetic field,Mr. Zhu Guangqian should be always our model for them.
出处
《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期15-27,189,共13页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)