期刊文献+

与特征断层结合的地震活动空间光滑模型在衡水市活断层地震危险性评价中的应用 被引量:3

The application of spatially smoothed seismicity model combined with the characteristics of the faults in Hengshui seismic risk evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在衡水市活断层地震危险性评价中,应用研究区域的地震活动性数据建立恰当的分布式地震活动性空间光滑模型,并结合断层对周边地震危险性的影响,计算前磨头断裂和衡水断裂在不同超越概率下上限震级分别为6.5、6.0级的区域基岩峰值加速度。研究发现,研究区域内50年超越概率为63%的基岩峰值加速度略有增加;50年超越概率为10%、5%的基岩峰值加速度在断层附近有所增加。研究表明在较低超越概率的情况下,断层周围如深州市、冀州市和衡水市辖区的地震危险性大于其他地区;利用仪器记录资料得到的地震活动性模型并结合断层资料计算出的地震危险性结果能够反映衡水地区现今的地震活动水平和危险性水平。 Using the historic seismic data and the fault properties,we calculate the regional peak ground acceleration( PGA) in the study area with the spatial distributed seismicity model and segmented seismicity model in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis( PSHA) of Hengshui City. Considering the impact of the characteristics of the faults,we obtain the PGA distribution for63%,10% and 5% P. E. in 50 a of two scenario earthquake and find that the PGA for 10% and5% in 50 a increased visibly. It indicates that if the probability of exceedance is low,the seismic risk is greater in near-field region such as Shenzhou,Jizhou and the downtown of Hengshui City.The result shows that,the seismic activity model based on the instrumental earthquake catalogs with the characteristics of the faults reflects the contemporary seismic hazard level of Hengshui area.
出处 《中国地震》 北大核心 2015年第2期390-398,共9页 Earthquake Research in China
基金 中国地震局地壳应力研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(ZDJ2013-13) 国家青年科学基金项目(41404044)共同资助
关键词 地震危险性评价 超越概率 空间光滑模型 Seismic risk evaluation Probability of exceedance Spatially smoothed seismicity model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1胥广银,金严.1998,弱震和中,等强度地震活动区地震活动性模型研究,见:中国地震局科技发展司和中国抗震设防区划图编委会,中国地震区划学术讨论会论文集,北京:地震出版社,43-49.
  • 2杨勇,史保平,孙亮.基于华北区域地震活动性分布的地震危险性评价模型[J].地震学报,2008,30(2):198-208. 被引量:13
  • 3Cornell C A, 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis,Bull Seism Soc Am, 58(5) ,1583 - 1606.
  • 4Frankel A D, Mueller C, Barnhard T, et al, 1996, National seismic-hazard maps: Documentation June 1996: [IS Geological Survey.
  • 5Frankel A, 1995, Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States,Seism Res Lett, 66(4) ,8 21.
  • 6Frankel A, Muel|er C, Barnhard T, et a|, 2000, USGS national seismic hazard maps, Earthquake Spectra, 16 (1) , 1 N 19.
  • 7Gutenberg B, Richter C F, 1944, Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull Seism Soc Am, 34(4):185- 188.
  • 8Kafka A L, Levin S Z, 2000, Does the spatial distribution of smaller earthquakes delineate areas where larger earthquakes are like|y to occur? Bull Seism Soc Am, 90(3) , 724 -738.
  • 9Kafka A L, Walcott J R, 1998, How well does the spatial distribution of smaller earthquakes forecast the locations of larger earthquakes in the Northeastern United States? Seism Res Lett, 69 (5): 428 N 440.
  • 10Kramer S L, 1996, Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall.

二级参考文献25

  • 1黄玮琼,时振梁,曹学锋.b值统计中的影响因素及危险性分析中b值的选取[J].地震学报,1989,11(4):351-361. 被引量:47
  • 2丁国瑜.1986.我国地震地质研究近况[M]//张存德编.中国地震年鉴(19s4).北京:地震出版社:44-48.
  • 3胥广银,金严.1998.弱震和中等强度地震活动区地震活动性模型研究[C]//中国地震区划学术讨论会论文集.北京地震出版社:43-49.
  • 4Al-Tarazi E, Sandvol E. 2007. Alternative models of seismic hazard evaluation along the Jordan-Dead Sea Transform[J]. Earthauake Spectra, 23(1) : 1-19.
  • 5Atkinson G M, Boore D M. 1995. Ground motion relations for eastern North America[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 85(1):17-30.
  • 6Bommer J J, Abrahamson N A, Strasser F O, Pecker A, Bard P Y, Bungum H, Cotton F, Fah D, Sabetta F, Scherbaum F, Studer J. 2004. The challenge of defining upper bounds on earthquake ground motions[J]. Seism Res Lett, 75(1): 82-95.
  • 7Boore D M,Joyner W B, Fumal T E. 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North America earthquakes: A summary of recent work[J]. Seism Res Lett, 68(1): 128-153.
  • 8Campbell K W. 2003. Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion(attenuation)relations in Eastern North America[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer ,93(3):1012-1033.
  • 9Cornell C A. 1968. Engineering seismic analysis[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 58(5) : 1583-1606.
  • 10Cramer C H. 2001. The new Madrid seismic zone: Capturing variability in seismic hazard analysis[J]. Seism Res Lett, 72(6) :664-672.

共引文献12

同被引文献58

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部