由司法论证转向立法论证——中西比较视域下对我国立法论证的思考

Diversion from Legal Argumentation to Legislative Argumentation——On the Legislative Argumentation in China from the Perspective of Sino- western Comparison

我国学界法律论证理论的研究对于推进我国司法改革和法治建设发挥了积极作用。相对于司法论证理论的研究而言,对立法论证的研究则基本处于空白状态。立法论证研究不足,主要是由于受制于法律中心主义和法院中心主义的研究范式,同时也由于司法论证与立法论证研究对象复杂性不同和论证模式不同。目前,西方国家的法律论证研究的重心已经转向立法论证,鉴于我国立法论证研究基本尚属空白,为此需要借鉴西方立法论证理论,实现由司法论证向立法论证的转向,为我国制度建设和法治建设提供理论支持。

The researches done by Chinese scholars into legal argumentation play a great role in the process of judiciary reform and development of ruling by law in China. Compared with the abundant research on legal argumentation,research on legislative argumentation is lacking. There are two reasons why research on legislative argumentation is lacking. The first reason is that the scholars is controlled by the paradigm of legalism and court- centered tendency; the second is the difference of complexity and argumentation model between legal argumentation and legislative argumentation. It is necessary to learn from the western legislative argumentation researches,and realize the diversion from research on legal argumentation to research on legislative argumentation,which will provide theoretical support for the establishment of institution and ruling by law in China.