期刊文献+

清代武生的管理、训练与考课 被引量:7

Supervision,Training and Examination for Military Licentiates in the Qing Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 清代在学武生归儒学教官监管,随营武生则归营员将弁约束。其常规月课,除骑射训练外,亦须研习兵家及儒家经典。武生岁试三年一次,学政按临主试,合格者得应武乡试。武生亦有入伍食粮、举优升监、改应文试、改捐文职、呈请游学、佥运漕粮、入营效力等机会,以助其历练发展。清代管课武生定例綦严,然武生犯赌涉讼、罢考闹考、贩售私货等弊情亦层出不穷。将文、武生员同附于儒学,并以儒学教官管课武生,使之符合传统养士"文武合一"之理想,乃清代武生管课之重要特征,亦为弊窦根源。武生在学未受到足够的军事训练,加之本身文艺荒疏,结果多是武艺不堪驰骋武场,文才亦不能决胜文闱,久试不第者,甚或为祸乡里,大悖朝廷设科初衷。武举终在清季危局中停废。 During the Qing dynasty, military licentiates registered in Confucian schools were supervised by the Confucian instructors, whereas those registered in local armies were regulated by the military officers. Apart from having horsemanship and archery as monthly regular training program, military licentiates also needed to study relevant Confucian and military classics. Military licentiates could take the tri-annual examination presided by the provincial educational commissioner, competing for the qualification of participating into provincial military examination. Besides, special opportunities were available for their training and development, i. e. , enrolling into the army to receive due provisions,being promoted by merit as student of the Imperial Academy, turning to the track of civil examination, securing civil positions through donation, conducting tour studies to broaden horizons, assisting in the transport of grains to the capital, and serving in the local garrisons. Regulations of supervision and examination for the Qing military licentiates were designed in an extremely stern nature, yet misconducts of military licentiates, such as gathering for gambling, inappropriately involving into lawsuits, inciting examination boycotts, and illegally selling private goods, etc. , still occurred frequently. In order to fit the traditional ideal of"integrating military and literary abilities'in fostering talents, both civil and military licentiates were set affiliated to Confucian schools and were thus mainly regulated by Confucian instructors, which appeared as an important characteristic in the supervision and training for the military licentiates in the Qing dynasty, meanwhile became the cause of prevailing malpraetices. Military licentiates did not receive enough martial training, and they themselves often lacked commendable literary competence. As a result, the military licentiates' martial arts were increasingly insufficient to perform in the field of military examination, whilst their literary abilities were equally inadequate to compete in the hall of civil examination. Those who failed to obtain an imperial degree after repeated examinations even became the source of local unrest, standing starkly opposite to the government 's original intention in adopting the military examination system which was inevitably abolished in the crisis of late Qing era.
作者 李林
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期50-60,共11页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 清代武举 管课武生 文武合一 弊情 military examination system in the Qing dynasty supervision and examination for military licentiates integration of military and literary abilities malpractices
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1《兵部为岁考事(抄录乾隆十年十二月二十六日上谕)》,史语所内阁大库档,档号:141857-001.
  • 2许友根.清末废武科原因再探[J].盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版),1998,18(1):69-72. 被引量:3
  • 3景清等:《钦定武场条例》卷一一《武生童考试二》,故宫珍本丛刊第338册,北京出版社2000年影印本,第495页.
  • 4王晓勇.清代武科举废除的历史反思与借鉴[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2013,15(3):31-35. 被引量:2
  • 5《道光十五六年分江西省斥革及注劣文武生员姓名清单》,台北故宫博物院藏清代军机档,档号:故机072434.
  • 6素尔纳等:《钦定学政全书》卷二四《约束生监》,近代中国史料丛刊初编第30辑第293册,台北,文海出版社1968年影印本第450-451页.
  • 7韩承贤:《清代初中期对罢考的惩处》,《清史问题》第32卷第2期,2011年12月.
  • 8嵩贵:《拟请武生归营管辖》,台北故宫博物院藏清代军机档,档号:故机011027.
  • 9张溥:《奏为敬陈管见仰请圣裁事》,《宫中档雍正朝奏折》第13辑,台北,故宫博物院1978年影印本,第329-330页.
  • 10王世琛:《奏为谨陈武生教演之法以收实用事》,《宫中档雍正朝奏折》第25辑,第726页.

二级参考文献12

  • 1蒋世弟,吴振棣.中国近代史参考资料[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1988.
  • 2魏源.魏源全集(第4册)[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2005.
  • 3高时良,黄仁贤.中国近代教育史资料汇编(洋务运动时期教育)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007.
  • 4冯桂芬著;戴扬本评注.校郧庐抗议[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1998.
  • 5顾廷龙,戴逸.李鸿章全集[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,1998.
  • 6朱有献.中国近代学制史料第一辑(下册)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1986.
  • 7孔昭明.台湾文献史料丛刊第九辑(183)[M].台北:台湾大通书局,1987.
  • 8谭国清.中华藏典传世文选(晚清文选)[M].北京:西苑出版社,2003.
  • 9沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊(231)格致新报1-6册[M].台北:文海出版社,1966.
  • 10[清]于宝轩.皇朝蓄艾文编(1-8)[M].台北:台湾学生书局,1965.

共引文献3

同被引文献72

引证文献7

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部