膝关节镜Clearfix与FasT-Fix半月板修复系统修复半月板损伤的效果比较

Effects of arthroscopic Clearfix and FasT-Fix meniscal repair system on meniscus injury

目的 比较膝关节镜Clearfix与FasT-Fix半月板修复系统修复半月板损伤的临床效果进行.方法 选取运城市急救中心自2006年至2010年收治的半月板损伤患者100例作为研究资料,分为Clearfix组和FasT-Fix组各50例,分别使用Clearfix系统修复半月板损伤和FasT-Fix系统修复半月板损伤.对两组患者的临床治疗效果进行比较;判定半月板损伤临床治疗效果的标准包括：关节无肿胀、无交锁、关节间隙无压痛感、半月板旋转试验（McMurray-Fouche试验）呈阴性.结果 对Clearfix组患者进行平均20个月（10～46个月）的随访调查,有35例半月板修复成功,临床治愈率为70％;对FasT-Fix患者进行平均21个月（11～45个月）的随访调查,有45例半月板修复成功,临床治愈率90％.结论 FasT-Fix系统在修复半月板损伤的临床效果比Clearfix系统好.

Objective To compare the effects of right knee arthroscopy Clearfix and FasT-Fix meniscal repair system on meniscus injury.Methods Select 100 patients with meniscus injury admitted to the first hospital,emergency center of yuncheng, from 2006 to 2010 as research data and divided them into two groups, with 50 patients in each group, including a group of patients with Clearfix system repair meniscus, another group was given FasT-Fix system repair meniscus.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.The criteria of the clinical effect of meniscus injury including： joint no swelling, no interlocking joint space without tenderness, meniscus rotation test （McMurray-Fouche test） was negative.Results Clearfix group of patients for an average of 20 months （10 ～ 46 months） follow-up survey, 35 meniscal repair was successful, the clinical cure rate was 70%;FasT-Fix patients for an average of 21 months （11 ～45 months） the follow-up survey, 45 meniscal repair was successful, the clinical cure rate was 90%.Conclusions FasT-Fix system repair meniscus is better clinical results than Clearfix systems.