期刊文献+

目标导向液体治疗后子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇脐带血血气异常的比较 被引量:6

A comparison of umbilical blood gas abnormalities between preeclampsia parturient and healthy parturient following goal directed fluid therapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨目标导向液体治疗后子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇脐带血血气异常的区别。方法行择期剖宫产术的健康孕妇26名(A组)、晚发型稳定期子痫前期孕妇26名(B组)。选用小剂量布比卡因(7.5mg)进行蛛网膜下腔硬膜外腔联合麻醉,在蛛网膜下腔麻醉给药同时采用LiDCOrapid系统提供的容量反应性参数[每搏量增加值(increment rate of stroke volume,ASV)]进行目标导向液体治疗使每搏量最优化,比较两组新生儿娩出后脐带血血气指标差异。结果B组需要第2次容量冲击的比例高于A组(54%比32%)。两组间低血压、血管活性药物用量等不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。A组脐动脉血氧饱和度[(39±16)%比(30±12)%]、脐静脉血氧饱和度[(64±15)%比(52±19)%]显著高于B组(P〈0.05),脐动、静脉乳酸浓度[(1.54±0.18)mmol/L比(1.82±0.63)mmol/L;(1.49±0.26)mmol/L比(1.84±0.50)mmol/L]低于B组(P〈0.05)。结论目标导向液体治疗后,除脐动、静脉血氧饱和度及乳酸以外,晚发型稳定期子痫前期孕妇与健康孕妇间其余脐带血血气指标没有显著的区别。 Objective To investigate whether the incidences of umbilical blood gas abnormalities are different between preeclampsia parturient and healthy parturient following goal-directed fluid therapy. Methods Twenty six healthy parturient (group A) and twenty six stable preeclampsia parturient (group B) scheduled for elective cesarean section were recruited. Standard combined spinal epidural anesthesia was performed with low dose bupivacaine (7.5 mg). At the time point of spinal injection, goaldirected fluid therapy was employed to optimize the stroke volume via the increment rate of stroke volume (ASV) provided by LiDCOrapid system. The umbilical blood gas abnormalities were recorded and analyzed. Results The ratio of parturient who needed second fluid challenge was higher in the preeclampsia group compared with the healthy control (54% vs32% ). There were no significant differences in the maternal hypotension incidence and vasopressors used (P〉0.05). In healthy parturient, the oxygen saturations in both umbilical artery [ (39±16)% vs (30±12)% ] and vein[ (64±15)% vs (52±19)% ] were significantly higher(P〈 0.05), and level of lactic acid [ (1.54±0.18) mmol/L vs ( 1.82±0.63 ) mmol/L in umbilical artery, (1.49±0.26) mmol/L vs ( 1.84± 0.50) mmol/L in umbilical vein] were lower than that in the preeclampsia group (P〈0.05). Conclusions Except for oxygen saturations and lactic acid, there were no significant differences in other umbilical blood gas parameters between stable preeclampsia parturient and healthy parturient following goal-directed fluid therapy in cesarean section.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2015年第12期1092-1097,共6页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基金 北京市优秀人才培养资助(2014000020124G160)
关键词 腰硬联合麻醉 子痫前期 脐带血 血气分析 目标导向液体治疗 Combined spinal epidural anesthesia Preeclampsia Umbilical blood Blood gas analysis Goal-directed fluid therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Singh R, Kumar N, Jain A, et al. Spinal anesthesia for lower segment cesarean section in patients with stable eclampsia [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2011, 23(3): 202-206.
  • 2Barra S, Cachulo Mdo C, Providencia R, et al. Hypertension in pregnancy: the current state of the art[J]. Rev Port Cardiol, 2012, 31(6): 425-432.
  • 3Mythen MG, Swart M, Acheson N, et al. Perioperative fluid management: consensus statement from the enhanced recovery partnership [J/OL]. Perioper Med (Lond), 2012, 1: 2. DOI:10. 1186/2047-0525-1-2.
  • 4Prakash S, Pramanik V, Chellani H, et al. Maternal and neonatal effects of bolus administration of ephedrine and phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a randomised study[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2010, 19( 1 ) : 24-30.
  • 5Ghaffari S, Malaki M, Rezaeifar A, et al. Effect of peripheral edema on oseillometric blood pressure measurement [J]. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res, 2014, 6(4): 217-221.
  • 6Thorp JA, Dildy GA, Yeomans ER, et al. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(3 Pt 1): 517-522.
  • 7Gregg AR, Weiner CP. "Normal" umbilical arterial and venous acid-base and blood gas values[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 36 (1): 24-32.
  • 8王金保,王姝媛,孙莉.FloTrac/VigileoTM系麻醉管理统用于重度妊高症剖宫产术的[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2011,32(4):409-411. 被引量:4
  • 9Ferrazzani S, Luciano R, Garofalo S, et al. Neonatal outcome in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2011, 87 (6): 445-449.
  • 10冀玲,杜鹃,朱正华,王强,朱萧玲,胡胜,熊利泽,张铁铮,陈绍洋.子痫前期孕妇剖宫术腰硬联合麻醉期间血流动力学和血浆一氧化氮变化[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2013,34(2):106-110. 被引量:13

二级参考文献25

  • 1方美珍.18例子痫剖宫产临床分析[J].实用妇科与产科杂志,1989,5(2):81-82. 被引量:4
  • 2舒静,陈惠珍.持续硬膜外麻醉对妊高征顽固性高血压的降压作用[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1995,11(2):108-109. 被引量:5
  • 3Lain KY, Roberts M. Contemporary concepts of the pathogenesis and management ofpreeclampsia. JAMA, 2002, 287(24): 3183-3186.
  • 4Prasser C, Bele S, Keyl C, et al. Evaluation of a new arterial pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibration. BMC Anesthesiol, 2007, 7( 11 ) : 9.
  • 5Chakravarthy M, Patil TA, Jayaprakash K. et al. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery- a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth, 2007, 10(2):121-126.
  • 6Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, et al. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus systeml. Critical Care, 2008, 12(3): R82.
  • 7Riley ET,Cohen SE,Macario A. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section:a comparison of time efficiency,costs,charges and complications[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,1995,(04):709-712.
  • 8Sia AT,Fun WL,Tan TU. The ongoing challenges of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetrics[J].Best Practice and Research:Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology,2010,(03):303-312.
  • 9Landau R. What's new in obstetric anesthesia[J].International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia,2009,(04):368-372.
  • 10Mancuso A,De Vivo A,Giacobbe A. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections:effects on neonatal short-term outcome.A prospective randomised study[J].Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine,2010,(10):1114-1118.

共引文献19

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部