期刊文献+

广西城市中学生物学教师教学风格的调查研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用问卷调查法对广西3个城市的中学生物学教师教学风格和学生所喜欢的教学风格类型进行调查与分析。结果表明,中学生物学教师的教学风格以严谨逻辑型为主,其次是幽默活跃型和关爱分享型,属于创新探索型的较少。在关爱分享型维度上,初中生物学教师得分显著高于高中生物学教师。最受学生喜爱的教学风格为关爱分享型,其次是幽默活跃型和创新探索型。对中学生物学教师改善教学风格和提升学生学习兴趣具有一定的指导意义。
出处 《生物学通报》 2015年第12期14-16,共3页 Bulletin of Biology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lewin K., Lippitt R., White R. K.. Patterns of aggressive be- havior in experimentally created "social climates". The Journal of Social Psychology, 1939,10(2) :269-299.
  • 2Grasha A. F.. A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority,personal model, facility and delegator.College Teach- ing, 1994,42(4) : 142- 149.
  • 3Griogorenko E. L., Sternberg R. J.. Style of thinking, abilities and academic perfbnnances. Exceptional Children, 1997,63(3):295-312.
  • 4李如密.教学艺术论[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1998.p,207,p,190.
  • 5阿斯亚.依克木.浅谈教师的教学风格[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,27(S1):218-219. 被引量:5
  • 6贺雯,张庆,黎雯君.教师有效教学风格的结构与形容词评定问卷编制[J].上海教育科研,2011(5):59-62. 被引量:16
  • 7Evans C.. ExpLoring the relationship between cognitive style and teaching style.Educational Psychology 2004,24(4):509-530.
  • 8贺雯,黎雯君,曹钰舒.教师教学风格的转变及其与学生学习关系的实验研究[J].现代中小学教育,2014,30(2):65-69. 被引量:9
  • 9Zembylas M., lsenbarger L.. Teaching science to students with learning disabilities: subverting the myths of labeling through teachers, caring and enthusiasm. Research in Science Educa- tion, 2002,32( 1 ):55-79.
  • 10Brewster A. B., Bowen G. L.. Teacher support and the sch- ool engagement of latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure.Child and Adolescent Social Work Jour- nal, 2004,21(1): 47-64.

二级参考文献30

  • 1贺雯.教师教学风格的调查研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):214-216. 被引量:54
  • 2徐丽华,傅亚强.中小学教师教学风格的影响因素研究[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(6):81-84. 被引量:10
  • 3Zhang L.F. &Sternberg, R. J.Thinking styles across cultures: Their relationships with student learning [J].US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2001,197-226.
  • 4Zhang, L. F. The preferred thinking styles in teaching inventory[D].Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.2003.
  • 5Zhang, L. F., Huang, J. F., & Zhang, L. L. Preferences in teaching styles among Hong Kang and U.S. university students [J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2005, 39: 1319-1331.
  • 6Zhang L.F., Preferred Teaching Styles and Modes of Thinking among University Students in China's Mainland [J], Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2006, 1(2): 95-107.
  • 7Conti, G. J. Identifying Your Teaching Style [M]. FL: Krieger Publishing Company , 2004. 76-91.
  • 8Steinberg, R. J.& Grigorenko, E. L. Are cognitive styles still in style [J].Amefican Psychologist, 1997, 52(7): 700-712.
  • 9Costa, M. L. Rensburg, &L. Rushton. N. Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in ordaopaedic undergraduate teaching [J]. Medical Education, 2007, 41: 214-217.
  • 10Zhang, L. F. Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance [J]. Educational Psychology, 2002,22(3 ):331-348.

共引文献28

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部