期刊文献+

国际治理与波黑安全

International Governance And Security of Bosnia and Herzegovina
原文传递
导出
摘要 1995年的《代顿协议》揭开了波黑和平发展的新篇章,同时也使波黑成为一个受多种国际力量监督和治理的非完全功能性国家。联合国、美国、欧盟、世界银行等主要国际行为体以不同的方式参与到波黑的战后治理中,力求促进波黑的和平巩固与民主转型。本文在分析了这些国际行为体对波黑危机调解及战后治理的方式及特点后指出,波黑在20年的国际治理之下政治景观没有实质性的改观,民族和解的目标仍未实现,国家安全依旧脆弱。 The Dayton Agreement of 1995 opened up a new era of peace and development for Bosnia and Herzegovina,it also formed a state with nonfull- functionunder various international supervision and control.The United Nations,the United States,the EU,the World Bank and other major international actors have participated,by various ways,in postwar Bosnia's governance in seeking to promote the Bosnian peace consolidation and democratic transition.Based on the analysis of the modes of mediation of crisis,postwar governance by international actors,author points out that Bosnia's political landscape didn' t change fundamentally,national reconciliation still is on the midway and national security is still fragile after 20 years of the Dayton Agreement
作者 左娅
出处 《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期11-18,92,共8页 Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1汪丽敏.《代顿协议》与波黑重建[J].东欧中亚研究,1999(3):45-52. 被引量:2
  • 2http ://www. dw - world, de/popups/popup_lupe/O, 62526 89,00. html.
  • 3甄鹏:《从波黑看西方的霸权式民主》,http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_67b915flOl01kwui.html.
  • 4http://news, xinhuanet, corn/world/2005 - 12/13/content_ 3915538. htm.
  • 5Jadranka Polovic," Utjecajmedunarodnih aktera na procese demokratizacije d~ava Zapadnog Balkana s posebnim osvrtom na Hr- vatsku", Medunarodne studije, god. 2013, hr. 1, str. 9 - 31.
  • 6http://www. mzzjw. cn/zgmzb/html/2013 - 05/31/content_ 92237. htm.
  • 7http ://news. xinhuanet.com/world/2005 - 05/11/content_ 2942058. htm.
  • 8左娅.克罗地亚入盟及其对西巴尔干国家的启示[J].俄罗斯东欧中亚研究,2013(6):55-61. 被引量:6
  • 9Catriona Mace,"ESDP Goes Live :the EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina" ,European Security Review , February 2003 , No. 16 ,p. 4.
  • 10Rory Keane ," EUFOR Mission for Bosnia by the End of 2004" ,European Security Review , July 2004 , No. 24 , p. 2.

二级参考文献61

  • 1扈大威.欧盟对西巴尔干地区政策评析[J].国际问题研究,2006(2):40-44. 被引量:5
  • 2F. Duchene,"The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence", in M. Kohnstamm & W. Hager eds. , A Nation Writ Large?. Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community , London: Macmillan, 1973, pp. 19 -20.
  • 3P. Ifestos, European Political Cooperation: towards a Framework of Supranational Diplomacy? Gower: Mdershot, 1987, p. 62.
  • 4Michael Smith, "Does the Flag Follow Trade? : ' Politicisation' and the Emergence of a European Foreign Policy", in J. Peterson and H. Sjursen eds. , A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP, London:Routledge, 1998, p. 83,78.
  • 5Mario Telo, "Reconsiderations: Three Scenarios", in Mario Telo ed. , European Union and New Regionalism , Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2001, p. 256.
  • 6R. Rosecrance, "The European Union : A New Type of International Actor", In J. Zielonka ed. , Paradoxes of European Foreign Policy, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998, p. 22.
  • 7[英]苏珊·斯特兰奇.《国际政治经济学导论,国家与市场》[M].经济科学出版社,1990年.第29页.
  • 8I. Manners," Normative Power Europe : a Contradiction in Terms", Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 2 (June 2002), pp. 235 -258.
  • 9Roy H. Jinsberg, The European Union in International Politics : Baptism by Fire, Lanham,Maryland: Rowman & Litflefield Publisher, Inc. , 2001, p. 278.
  • 10Hedley Bull, "Civilian Power Europe: a Contradiction in Terms?" Journal of Common Market Studies 21, 1 (September 1982), pp. 149 -170,150-151.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部