期刊文献+

黏液型铜绿假单胞菌耐药性及β内酰胺酶耐药表型检测 被引量:5

The drug resistance and β lactamase phenotype detection of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检测黏液型铜绿假单胞菌对常见抗生素的敏感性及其超广谱13内酰胺酶耐药表型的表达。方法标本接收后分别划线接种于不同平板进行细菌分离培养及鉴定,对分离出的黏液型铜绿假单胞菌进行药物敏感性检测,结果依据CLSI2013进行判断。药物敏感性检测采用K—B纸片扩散法,B内酰胺酶耐药表型检测采用Etest法。统计学方法采用SPSS19.0,不同产酶组间药物敏感性比较采用X2检验,P〈0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果黏液型铜绿假单胞菌对常见抗菌药物敏感率均在70%以上,其中阿米卡星、妥布霉素、庆大霉素、亚胺培南和美罗培南敏感率超过90%。C类头孢菌素酶(AmpC酶)阳性率28.3%(56/198),AmpC酶阳性株与阴性株相比,药物敏感性较低,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、阿米卡星、头孢他啶、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和氨曲南对抗菌药物敏感率差异均有统计学意义(X2=3.89~14.45,P均〈0.05);超光谱13内酰胺酶(ESBLs)阳性率10.6%(21/198),ESBLs阳性株头孢他啶和氨曲南敏感率[分别为42.9%(9/21)和57.1%(12/21)]与阴性株[分别为73.5%(130/177)和72.3%(128/177)]相比,差异有统计学意义(x2=5.06和19.24,P均〈0.05),对其他抗生素敏感率差异无统计学意义(X2=0.01—3.47,P均〉0.05);金属p内酰胺酶(MBL)阳性率19.7%(39/198),除庆大霉素和氨曲南外MBL阳性株对常见抗生素敏感率均低于阴性株(X2=4.07—15.99,P均〈0.05);所有检测株均为肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)阴性。结论黏液型铜绿假单胞菌对常见抗生素敏感性较高,但产酶株对某些抗生素敏感性较差,临床医生应根据实验室结果及时调整用药。 Objective To investigate the drug sensitivity of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa to common antibiotics and the expression of β-1actamase-resistant phenotype. Methods The specimens were inoculated onto different disks to isolate and cultivate bacteria. The antibiotic susceptibility of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was detected and judged by CLSI 2013. The detection of drug resistance was done by Kirby-Bauer (K-B) method and β lactamase-resistant phenotype was detected by E-test. SPSS19. 0 was used to statistic data and X2 test was used to compare the antibiotic susceptibility between different groups. For all statistical test, a P values less than 0. 05 was defined as statistically significant. Results The susceptibilities of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the regular antibiotics were above 70% , of which the sensitivities to amikacin, to bramycin, gentamicin, imipenem and meropenem were higher than 90%. The positive rate of ampler class C β-1actamase (AmpC) was 28.3% (56/198). The drug sensitivity of positive strains was lower than that of the negative strains, and the differentiation was significant to piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, ceftazidime, levofloxaein, ciprofloxacin and aztreonam (X2 = 3.89 - 14. 45, all P 〈0. 05 ). The positive rate of extended spectrum β-1actamase(ESBLs) was 10. 6% (21/198). The drug sensitivity to ceftazidime and aztreonam of positive strains [ 42. 9% (9/21)and 57.1% (12/21) , 2 respectively]. It was lower than that of the negative strains[73.5% ( 130/177 ) and 72.3% (128/177) 1 , X2= 5.06 and 19. 24, both P 〈 0. 05. The difference of the other antibiotics was not significant ( ~2 = 0. 01 - 3.47, all P 〉0. 05). The positive rate of metallo-^-lactamase (MBL) was 19.7% (39/198), and the drug susceptibility of positive strains was lower than that of negative strains except gentamicin and aztreonam( X2 = 4.07 - 15.99, all P 〈 0. 05). All the detected strains were Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase ( KPC ) negative. Conclusions The antibiotic susceptible rate of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa was high, but some enzyme-produced strains were lower. The clinician should adjust medicine program by the results of laboratory.
出处 《中华检验医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期865-868,共4页 Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81400586)
关键词 铜绿假单胞菌 抗药性 细菌 Β内酰胺酶类 微生物敏感性试验 V表型 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drug resistance, bacterial beta-Lactamases Microbial sensitivity tests Phenotype
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献148

  • 1吴安华,任南,文细毛,徐秀华,全国医院感染监测网.医院内感染非发酵革兰阴性杆菌的病原学与耐药性监测研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2004,27(11):764-766. 被引量:42
  • 2朱元元,徐峰.留置导管内细菌生物膜感染的研究进展[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(1):115-117. 被引量:42
  • 3孔晋亮,刘晓岚,陈一强,王立赞,闫萍,温红侠.银染法观察铜绿假单胞菌生物被膜变化初探[J].济宁医学院学报,2007,30(1):27-29. 被引量:13
  • 4张卓然,倪语星.临床微生物学和微生物检验[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:289-290.
  • 5Melchior MB, Fink-Gremmels J, Gaastra W. Comparative as sessment of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis in biofilm versus planktonic culture[J]. J Vet Med B,2006,53(7):326-332.
  • 6McBain AJ. Chapter 4 :in vitro biofilm models: an overview [J]. Adv Appl Mierobiol,2009,69:99- 132.
  • 7Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappinscott HM. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 1995; 49:711-745.
  • 8Werner E, Roe F, Bugnicourt A, et al. Stratified growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70: 6188-6196.
  • 9Moskowitz SM, WEmerson JC, McNamara S, et al. Rando- mized trial of biofilm testing to select antibiotics for cystic fibrosis airway infection. Pediatr Pulmono12011; 46:18~ 192.
  • 10Herrmann C~ Yang L, Wu H, et al. Colistin-tobramycin combinations are superior to monotherapy conceming killing ofbiofilm Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J lnfect Dis 2010; 202: 1585-1592.

共引文献98

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部