国家安定与个人权利保障:转型悖论及其消解被引量：1

State Security and Individual Rights Protection:the Paradox of Transition and Its Elimination

下载PDF

导出

摘要国家安定与个人权利保障是两种重要但不同的公共利益,二者之间存在着互为条件、相互限制和相互渗透的辩证关系。二者之间的相互作用可能导致四种结果:良性循环、社会动荡、权利抑制和恶性循环。根据维护国家安定与保障个人权利互动关系的结构模型,由权利诉求导致的社会冲突压力与国家对社会冲突的控制化解能力是影响二者实现良性循环的主要因素。发展中国家要消解促进人权实现过程中的"转型悖论",一方面需要降低权利诉求所产生的社会冲突压力,另一方面需提高国家对社会冲突的控制化解能力,使个人权利保障与国家安定能够实现良性循环。 The state security and individual right protection are two important but different public interests which are mutual conditions,mutual restriction and mutual penetration.The interaction between them may lead to four results:virtuous cycle,social unrest,suppression of rights and vicious circle.According to the Structure Model of the Interaction between the State Security and Individual Rights,the pressure of social conflicts caused by the right demands and the capability of controlling and resolving social conflicts are the main factors that affect the result of the interaction.To dispel the'paradox of transition'in the process of promoting human rights and realize the virtuous cycle between the safeguard of individual rights and the stability of the state can be realized.Developing countries should reduce the social conflicts caused by the demands of rights on the one hand,and improve the capability of controlling and resolving social conflicts on the other.

作者常健刘明

机构地区南开大学周恩来政府管理学院南开大学人权研究中心

出处《学术界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第11期21-30,324,共10页 Academics

基金教育部人权教育与培训基地重大项目"市场经济初创时期各国人权发展道路比较研究"(12JJD820021) 国家社科规划重点项目"公共领域冲突管理体制研究"(13AGL005)的研究成果

关键词国家安定个人权利保障社会冲突压力冲突控制化解能力转型悖论 state security individual rights social conflict conflict pressure capability of conflict control and resolution the paradox of transition

分类号 D998.2 [政治法律—国际法学] D035.3 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1曼弗雷德·诺瓦克.《(公民权利和政治权利国际公约)评注》,孙世彦,毕小青译,生活·读书·三联出书店,2008年,第507页.
2William F. Felice, "The Case For Collective Human Rights," in Human Rights, ed. Richard Falk Hilal Elver and Lisa Hajjar ( London and New York: Routledgc) , p. 321.
3Zohan Barany, "Unrest and State Response in Arab Monarchies", Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 2, 2013, pp.5-11.
4《沙特妇女首次获得选举权与被选举权》,“新华网”,2011年9月25日,http://news.xinhuanet.corn/world/2011-09/25/c_122085254.htm.
5《沙特称新就业计划实行一年来增加25万本国人就业》,“中华人民共和国商务部网站”,2012年8月21日,http://www.mofcom.gov.en/aarticle/i/jyjl/k/201208/20120808296214.html.
6Tarik Yousef, Employment, Development, and the Social Contract in Middle East and North Africa, Washington, DC : World Bank, 2004, pp. 6 - 10.
7EGYPT: Nearly A Third of Children Malnourished, http ://www. irinnews, org/printreport, aspx7 re- portid = 86893.
8陈敏华.集群式革命之“阿拉伯之春”[J].阿拉伯世界研究,2013(3):62-70. 被引量：10
9《埃及有5%的人口处于食品不安全状态》,"中华人民共和国商务部网站",2015年6月10日,http://www.mofeom.gov.en/article/i/jyjl/k/201506/20150601007967.shtml.
10《图说阿拉伯之春五国现状:恶之花盛开的地方》,"新华网",2015年4月8日,http://news.xinhuanet.eom/world/2015-04/08/c_1276692482.htm.

二级参考文献10

1[美]戴维·波普诺著李强等译.《社会学》(第10版)[M].中国人民大学出版社,1999年版.第188页.
2章鲁生:《腐败藏在繁荣背后:一场不受约束的改革养肥埃及权贵》, 《青年参考》,2011年11月3日.
3[美]戴维·波普诺著,李强等译.《社会学》(第10版),北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999年版,第594页.
4Robert Alun Jones, Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1986. pp. 24-59.
5Ralph H.Tumer, "Collective Behavior", In R.Faris,ed;Handbook of Modern Sociology, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964, pp.382-425.
6[美]和田浩明.《中东民主化导致经济严重恶化——“阿拉伯之春”一周年》,载《经济学人》周刊,2012年3月6日.
7Hussein Ibish, "Was the Arab Spring Worth It?, "Foreign Policy, July 8,2012.
8Michael J. Totten ,"Arab Spring or Islamist Winter?", World Affairs, January 2,2012.
9Catherine O'Donnell, "New Study Quantifies Use of Social Media In Arab Spring," World Affairs, September 21,2011.
10蒋传瑛.中东剧变对变革中阿拉伯国家经济的影响[J].阿拉伯世界研究,2012(6):31-43. 被引量：6