期刊文献+

Deviation between Expression and Practice: Theoretical Reflection on Preliminary Investigation of Duty Crime

Deviation between Expression and Practice:Theoretical Reflection on Preliminary Investigation of Duty Crime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Preliminary investigation generates from China's investigation practice of duty crime spontaneously.The deviation between expression and practice of preliminary investigation has both advantages and disadvantages,doing more harm than good.In order to solve the problem,the benefit drive mechanism of actors of preliminary investigation should be changed from two aspects:to make mechanism of target assessment scientific and to evade risks from objects being investigated;legal consequences for violating preliminary investigation procedure,implementation mechanism and supervision and restriction mechanism of right to preliminary investigation should be reasonably established. Preliminary investigation generates from China ' s investigation practice of duty crime spontaneously. The deviation between expression and practice of preliminary investiga- tion has both advantages and disadvantages, doing more harm than good. In order to solve the problem, the benefit drive mechanism of actors of preliminary investigation should be changed from two aspects : to make mechanism of target assessment scientific and to evade risks from objects being investigated; legal consequences for violating preliminary investigation procedure, implementation mechanism and supervision and restriction mechanism of right to preliminary investigation should be reasonably established.
出处 《学术界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第11期269-274,共6页 Academics
基金 the staged achievement of the National Social Science Fund Project“Supervision and Restriction Mechanism of the Procuratorial Investigation Power”(12CFX041)
关键词 职务犯罪 侦查 偏差 利益驱动机制 监督约束机制 目标评价 法律后果 调查程序 preliminary investigation deviation actors of preliminary investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1姜绍明.初查,从一句传闻开始[J].人民检察,2004(8):68-69. 被引量:5
  • 2孙长永,杨柳.论刑事立案前的初查[J].河北法学,2006,24(1):58-62. 被引量:30
  • 3特里·L·库珀.行政伦理学:实现行政责任的途径,张秀琴译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
  • 4[12]彼得·什托姆普卡.信任:一种社会学理论[M].程胜利,译.北京:中华书局,2005.
  • 5[3]米切尔·黑尧.现代国家的政策过程[M].赵成根,译.北京:中国青年出版社,2004.
  • 6[4]米歇尔·克罗齐埃.科层现象[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
  • 7[1]多丽斯·A·格拉伯.沟通的力量--公共组织的信息管理[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007:251.
  • 8[2]詹姆斯·Q·威尔逊.官僚机构:政府机构的作为及其原因[M].北京:三联书店,2006.
  • 9[4]LIPSKY M.Strsst-level Bureaucracy[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1980:5-9.
  • 10[7]青木昌彦.市场的作用·国家的作用[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2002:42.

共引文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部