期刊文献+

预测高考考生能力水平 调控高考试题难度研究探新 被引量:3

Exploration of Predicting the Ability of College Entrance Examinee and Adjusting the Difficulty of College Entrance Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国,社会各界普遍希望高考历年分数线基本保持不变,但是由于每年题目不同,考生能力水平也有波动,要实现上述目标就需要预测考生能力水平并据此调控试题难度。本研究基于课题组2010年起在海南和云南试点的高考等值研究,根据项目反应理论对外锚卷进行题目参数的估计,结合条件最大似然估计和同时校准的方法,使各试卷的能力水平均置于同一量尺。再以回归和K近邻法建立外锚卷和高考能力水平间的预测关系,并以2014年的高考数据进行检验。结果显示,在英语和数学(文、理)上,回归方法对2014年考生能力水平的预测精度都较高,K近邻法仍需进一步改进。 The stakeholders of College Entrance Examination (CEE) feel that admission scores should remain unchanged. Predicting the examinees" ability and adjusting the difficulties to keep the admission score stable is a great challenge for testing institutions because of that every examination is brand new and the mean ability level of examinees varies every year. Based on the teams" equating research about CEE in Hainan and Yunnan provinces since 2010, the study includes the following aspects: a)estimating the parameters of items and persons on external test and CEEs with concurrent calibration and conditional maximum likelihood to transform the scores from different tests onto a common scale, b)the prediction relationship was built between external test and CEE with regression model and K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) according to the past data and verified using the data of CEE in 2014. The results show that the regression model had higher prediction accuracy than KNN on English and Math subjects.
出处 《中国考试》 2015年第12期3-10,共8页 journal of China Examinations
基金 2014年度国家社会科学基金项目"学校利益相关者视角下实施高考新方案的教育功效研究"(项目批准号:14BGL128)的研究成果之一
关键词 项目反应理论 制标 预测 高考 Item Response Theory Scale Aligning Predicting College Entrance Examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1TURNBULL W W. Student change, program change: Why the SAT scores kept falling[J]. ETS Research Report Series, 1985, 1985 (2): i-10.
  • 2CHALL J S. An Analysis of Textbooks in Relation to Declining SAT Scores[J]. 1977.
  • 3KURTH M M. Teachers' unions and excellence in education: An analysis of the decline in SAT scores[J]. Journal of Labor Research, 1987, 8(4): 351-367.
  • 4LORGE I, KRUGLOV L. A Suggested Technique for the Improve- ment of Difficulty Prediction of Test Items[J]. Educational and Psy- chological Measurement, 1952, 12: 554-561.
  • 5BEJAR I I, EMBRETSON S, MAYER R E. Cognitive Psychology and the Sat: A Review of Some Implications[J]. ETS Research Re- port Series, 1987, 1987: i-73.
  • 6QUERESHI M Y, FISHER T L. Logical Versus Empirical Estimates of Item Difficuhy[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37: 91-100.
  • 7CHENG L S. On varying the difficulty of test items[C]//On varying the difficulty of test items. A paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assess- ment, Singapore.
  • 8CRISP V, HOPKIN R. Modelling question difficulty in an A-level Physics examination, London 2011.
  • 9FREEDLE R, KOSTIN I. The Prediction of Gre Reading Compre- hension Item Difficulty for Expository Prose Passages for Each of Three Item Types: Main Ideas, Inferences and Explicit Statements [J]. ETS Research Report Series, 1991, 1991: i-53.
  • 10FREEDLE R, KOSTIN, IRENE. The Prediction of Toefl Reading Comprehension Item Difficulty for Expository Prose Passages for Three Item Types: Main Idea, Inference, and Supporting Idea Items [J]. ETS Research Report Series, 1993, 1993: i-48.

二级参考文献74

  • 1梁永霞,杨中楷,刘则渊.基于CiteSpaceⅡ的航空航天工程前沿研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(S2):303-312. 被引量:21
  • 2谭云兰,丁树良,辛锐铭,冯慧君.基于IRT模型参数的BP神经网络估计[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,40(17):56-57. 被引量:15
  • 3黄正玉.高中物理能力倾向测验难度设计的理论与实践[c].南昌:江西师范大学,2005.
  • 4Joanna S, Susan E. Item difficulty modeling of paragraph comprehension items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006, 30 (5) : 394--411.
  • 5Perking K, Gupta L, Tammana R. Predicting item difficulty in a reading comprehension test with an artificial neural network. Language Testing, 1995, 12(1): 34--53.
  • 6Birbaum A, Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick (Eds.),Statistical Theories of Mental Test. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley,1968. 397-472.
  • 7Mislevy R J, Bock R D. Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software Inc, 1986.
  • 8Lord F M. Application of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. HiUsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1980.
  • 9Bock R D, Lieberman M. Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 1970, 35:179 - 197.
  • 10Frank B. Baker, Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques, Marcel Dekker, Inc, 1992.

共引文献99

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部