期刊文献+

睑板腺热脉动系统治疗睑板腺功能障碍的临床观察 被引量:16

Clinical evaluation of a thermodynamic treatment system for meibomian gland dysfunction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价睑板腺热脉动系统治疗睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的临床效果及安全性。方法回顾性系列病例研究。本研究对48例(96只眼)MGD患者进行12rain的睑板腺热脉动系统治疗,在治疗前、治疗后4周及12周进行包括主观症状、泪膜稳定性、脂质层厚度(LLT)、睑板腺缺失情况等方面的临床评估,不同时间点有效性评估参数的变化采用独立样本t检验进行分析。结果48例MGD患者进行睑板腺热脉动系统治疗后随访12周,患者主观症状明显缓解,眼表疾病评分指数(OSDI)由治疗前(45.36±19.34)分降至4周后的(23.82±11.94)分及12周的(25.66±14.12)分,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.009,1.976;P=0.035,0.038)。睑板腺开口数量由治疗前(2.91±1.13)个增加至治疗后4周的(6.27±2.37)个(f=3.505,P〈0.001)及12周的(5.15±2.08)个(t=2.004,P=0.027);睑板腺分泌物性状由治疗前(6.18±2.48)分增至4周后的(13.55±3.46)分0=2.689,P=0.005)及12周后的(12.67±3.41)分(f=2.403,P=0.009)。患者LLT较治疗前(42.13±9.67)nm明显增加,分别为治疗后4周的(59.02±16.39)nm(t=2.971,P=0.002)及12周的(54.65±12.52)nm(t=2.021,P=0.021),差异有统计学意义。不完全瞬目比率也由治疗前的0.37±0.30降至4周后的0.15±0.140=3.428,P=0.035)及12周后的0.12±0.13(t=1.986,P=0.026)。BUT在经过睑板腺热脉动系统的治疗后得到明显缓解,由治疗前的(4.73±2.34)S增至4周后的(9.32±2.18)s(t=3.385,P〈0.001)及12周后的9.91±3.01S(t=3.253,P〈0.001),差异有统计学意义。治疗1d后进行安全性评估,与基线相比:最佳矫正视力、角膜染色及眼压无明显变化(P=0.141,O.376,0.421)。结论12周的临床观察表明,睑板腺热脉动系统是一种有效且安全的MGD治疗方法. [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a single thermodynamic treatment system (LipiFlow) for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods Retrospective series case study. Forty-eight subjects with meibomian gland dysfunction were analyzed before and after 12 minutes LipiFlow system treatment. All subjects were examined before, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after this treatment. Subjective symptoms, lipid layer thickness (LLT), expressible meibomian gland, tear break-up time, meibomian gland assessment and ocular surface staining were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.5 software. Analysis included those independent sample two-tailed t-tests for comparison of the mean change from baseline to 4 weeks and baseline to 12 weeks after Lipiflow treatment. Statistically significant difference was based on α=0.05 (P〈0.05). Results A total of 48 cases completed the 12-week follow-up. MGD patients with LipiFlow treatment had a significant reduction in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores with 45.36±19.34 before treatment, 23.82± 11.94 at 4 weeks (t=2.009, P=0.035) and 25.66± 14.12 at 12 weeks (t=1.976 P=0.038). LipiFlow resulted in a higher number of expressible glands from 2.91±1.13 (baseline) to 6.27±2.37 (4 weeks, t=3.505, P〈0.001) and 5,15±2.08 (12 weeks, t=2.004, P= 0.027) and change of secretion quality from 6.18-±2.48 (baseline) to 13.55±3.46 (4 weeks, t=2.698, P=0.005) and 12.67±3.41 (12 weeks, t=2.403, P=0.009). In addition, a single thermodynamic treatment increase the LET from (42.13 ± 9.67)nm (baseline) to (59.02± 16.39)nm (4 weeks, t=2.971, P=0.002 ) and (54.65 ± 12.52)nm ( 12 weeks, t=2.021, P=0.021 ). The rate of partial blink was relieved from 0.37±0.30 (baseline) to 0.15-±0.14 (4 weeks, t=3.428, P=0.035)and 0.12±0.13 ( 12 weeks, t=1.986, P=0.026). BUT was increased from (4.73± 2.34)s (baseline) to (9.32 ± 2.18)s (4 weeks, t=3.385, P〈O.001)and (9.91 ± 3.01)s (12 weeks, t=3.253, P〈 0.001). There were no unanticipated or serious device-related adverse events reported. Compared with baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in BCVA, corneal staining and intraoeular pressure (P=0.141, 0.376, 0.421). Coneluslon The LipiFlow system was a safety and effeetiveness treatment of MGD in the 12-week study.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期924-931,共8页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项基金(首发2011-1016-04) 中央保健局科研发展基金(w2013BJ47)
关键词 睑板腺 眼睑疾病 热敷 治疗结果 Meibomian glands Eyelid diseases Hot compress Treatment outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian GlandDysfunction: Executive Summary[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011, 52(4): 1922- 1929.
  • 2Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand[J]. Cornea, 2006, 25(10): 1162- 1167.
  • 3Lin PY, Cheng CY, Hsu WM, et al. Association between symptoms and signs of dry eye among an elderly chinese population in Taiwan: The Shihpai eye study[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2005, 46(5): 1593-1598.
  • 4Labb6 A, Wang YX, Jie Y, et al. Dry eye disease, dry eye symptoms and depression: the Beijing Eye Study[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2013, 97(11): 1399-1403.
  • 5Blackie CA, Carlson AN, Korh DR. Treatment fnr meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye symptoms with a single-dose vectored thermal pulsation: a review[J]. Curt Opin Ophthahuol, 2015, 26(4): 306-313.
  • 6Benitez Del Castillo JM, Kaereher T, Mansour K, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of an eyelid warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2014, 8: 2019-2027.
  • 7Finis D, Kcinig C, Hayajneh J, et al. Six-month effects of a thermodynamic treatment for MGD and implications of meibomian gland atrophy[J]. Cornea, 2014, 33(12): 1265- 1270.
  • 8Lemp MA, Baudouin C, Baum J, et al. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007)[J]. Ocul Surf, 2007, 5(2): 75-92.
  • 9Korb DR, Blackie CA. Case report: a successful LipiFlow treatment of a single case of meibomian gland dysfunction and dropout[J/OL]. Eye Contact Lens, 2013, 39(3): e 1-3.
  • 10Bron AJ. Evans VE, Smith JA, et al. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests[J]. Cornea, 2003, 22(7): 640-650.

同被引文献123

引证文献16

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部