期刊文献+

雇佣关系模式对福祉影响的差异——基于激励—贡献模型视角 被引量:8

The Influence of Different Types of Employment Relationship Approaches on Well-being:An Empirical Study from a Perspective of Inducements-contributions Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从激励一贡献模型视角,分析基于提供激励和期望贡献两维度划分的四种雇佣关系模式对企业和员工两层次福祉的差异性影响。对中国九个代表性城市81家企业850名企业员工进行了问卷调查,最终获得522个有效样本,运用SPSS和LISREL软件进行实证分析,发现不同雇佣关系模式下福祉有显著性差异。研究结果表明,采取组织导向型雇佣关系模式时,企业劳资和谐表现得最好,员工身心健康程度最高;采取投资不足型雇佣关系模式时,员工工作满意度最低。进一步的多变量方差分析和协方差分析基本证实研究结果。 The relationship between organization and their employees has been described as employment relationship.Scholars have paid great attention to what kind of employment relationship approaches(ERA) is suitable for enterprise development from a perspective of economic performance.However,scholars are growingly aware that emphasizing exclusively on the economic logic and ignoring well-being will result in negative outcomes of enterprise development.Currently,scholars have advocated building compassionate academic community.And they have agreed that ERA not only intends to maximize profits for enterprises,but also to benefit greatly towards well-being of enterprises and employees.This benefit makes a substantial supplement to economic performance of the enterprises.Despite of a booming priority to the social,cultural and ecological civilized construction in Chinese government,ERA practices in Chinese enterprises are with little regard for the well-beings of enterprises and employees.From the perspective of Chinese government policy and the organizational management,research on ERA keeps pace with times,and closely links to managerial practices.Conclusively,previous studies took a solely economic perspective to evaluate the applicability of ERA,and rarely took the well-being into account This paper attempts to explore the influence of different types of ERA on the well-being from the perspective of inducements-contributions model.We have conducted surveys on 850 employees in 81 enterprises in 9 cities in China,and finally obtained 522 valid samples data We have analyzed our data using SPSS and LISREL statistical software.Our findings show that when the enterprise takes organization-oriented ERA,harmonious industrial relations climate is the best,physical and mental health of employees is the highest;when the enterprise takes under-investment ERA,employees' job satisfaction is the worst.The supplementary MANCOVA and ANCOVA analyses further confirmed these findings.Theoretically,our paper is in a creative way to introduce the well-being of enterprises and employees as outcome variables in the field of employment relationship.Using empirical research methods,this paper have revealed that there are differences in the influence of different types of ERA on the well-being on two levels of enterprises and employees from incentive-contribution model perspective.It provides the theoretical and empirical support for a better understanding of the influence of different types of ERA on the well-being.Findings enrich the research on outcome variables of ERA.We also propose three fields for further research on the relationship between ERA and the well-being.Practically,this study offers enterprises an important implication for the implementation of ERA in Chinese transitional economy.At the macro level,governmental administrative departments could improve the existing regulations and other supporting legal systems.Our empirical results encourage Chinese enterprises to adopt organizationoriented ERA.At the enterprise level,enterprises could change the concept of human resource management development,actively seek appropriate ERA,and efficiently reply to new changes in the labor market and employment relations.First,enterprises could strive to improve their internal management system and operational level rules.Second,in order to promote harmonious industrial relations climate and the physical and mental health of employees,enterprises could actively take organization-oriented ERA.Again,to enhance corporate reputation and employee career happiness,enterprises can take over organization-oriented or over-investment ERA.Finally,to ensure employee job satisfaction,corporate investment does not take under-investment ERA.
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期56-67,共12页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"中国企业雇佣关系模式与人力资源管理创新研究"(71332002) 国家自然科学基金面上项目"中国转型经济下企业劳资冲突的发生机制及对策研究"(71172063) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目"企业家驱动型人力资源管理创新过程:雇佣关系模式的双重作用"(2014M561628)
关键词 雇佣关系模式 福祉 激励-贡献模型 劳资和谐 身心健康 employment relationship approaches well-being inducements-contributions model harmonious industrial relations climate physical and mental health of employees
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Barnett M L, Jermier J M,Lafferty B A. Corporate Reputation;The definitional Landscape[ J]. Corporate Reputation Review,2006,9,(l);26 -38.
  • 2Beehr T A,Newman J E. Job Stress,Employee Health,and Organizational Effectiveness:A Facet Analysis,Model,and Litera-ture Reviewf J]. Personnel Psychology, 1978 ,31 ,(4) :665 -699.
  • 3Brayfleld A H,Rothe H F. An Index of Job Satisfaction[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951,35,(5) :307 -311.
  • 4Chin W W. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling[ J]. Modem Methods for Business Research,1998,295,(2) :295 -336.
  • 5Cummins R A, Hunter B, Davem M. The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: An Overview [ J]. Social Indicators NetworkNews,2003,76,(l) :1 -4.
  • 6Dastmalchian A,Blyton P, Adamson R. Industrial Relations Climate:Testing a Construct[ J]. Journal of Occupational Psychol-ogy, 1989,62, (1 ) ;21 -32.
  • 7Evers A,Frese M,Cooper C L Revisions and Further Developments of the Occupational Stress Indicator:LISREL Results fromFour Dutch Studies [ J ]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology ,2000,73 , ( 2) :221 -240.
  • 8Grant A M,Christianson M K,Price R H. Happiness, Health,or Relationships? Managerial Practices and Employee Well-be-ing Tradeoffs[ J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives,2007,21,(3) :51 -63.
  • 9Hall R. The strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13 ,(2) : 135 - 144.
  • 10Horn P W,Tsui A S,Wu J B. Explaining Employment Relationships with Social Exchange and Job Embeddedness[ J]. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 2009,94, (2) :277 -297.

二级参考文献79

  • 1[印]阿玛蒂亚·森.《以自由看待发展》,任赜,于真译,中国人民大学出版社,2002年7月版.
  • 2冯同庆.《工人阶级内部阶层的社会分化》[A].沈明明主编.《改革发展与社会变迁》[C].华夏出版社,2001年..
  • 3罗德明 吕晓波.《中国“单位”的结构变化—微观政治变迁的宏观影响》[A].沈明明主编.《改革发展与社会变迁》[C].华夏出版社,2001年..
  • 4厉以宁.《中国经济体制改革的伦理学思考》[A].沈明明主编.《改革发展与社会变迁》[C].华夏出版社,2001年..
  • 5Tsui,A S ,Wang, D , and Zhang, Y ,2002, "Employment Relationships with Chinese Middle Managers" , In Anne S. Tsui and Chung-Ming Lau (eds.),The management of enterprises in the People's Republic of China, 347-374.Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • 6Wang, D , Tsui, A S , Zhang, Y and Ma, L ,2003,"Employment Relationships and Firm Performance: Evidence from An Emerging Economy",Journal of Organizational Behavior,24:511-535.
  • 7Wright, M , Hoskisson, R E , Busenitz, L W , and Dial, J ,2000, "Entrepreneurial Growth Through Privatization: The Upside of Management Buyouts",Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 591-601.
  • 8Xin, K , Zhao, S , & Tsui, A S ,1998,"Supply and Development of Executives and Middle Managers in China",In J C Bartels (eds.), Evolution of Business Practices: China opportunities and Risk, 182 -197 , Murray Hill, NJ: Dun and Bradstreet.
  • 9Zahra, Z A , Ireland, R D , Gutierrez, I , and Hitt,M A ,2000, "Privatization and Entrepreneurial Transformation: Emerging Issues and A Future Research Agenda",Academy of Management Review,25 (3): 509-524.
  • 10Barnard, C I , 1938, The Functions of t he Executive,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

共引文献78

同被引文献142

引证文献8

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部