期刊文献+

不确定性、知识创新与企业的性质——对科斯“企业的性质”理论逻辑的再审视 被引量:2

Uncertainty, Knowledge Innovation andthe Nature of the Firm:——A Logical Review of Coase's Theory of the Firm Nature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据科斯主张的从不确定性出发探讨企业本质的思路,对不确定性作出了新的三类别区分,并重新审视了科斯企业理论在该三类不确定性下的逻辑。研究显示,在第一、二类不确定性即奈特区分的风险与不确定性下,科斯企业理论存有逻辑漏洞,而在对未来完全无知的第三类不确定性下,行为人为实现知识创新能力的动态最大化而选择在亚经济体规模上共享知识时,也将导致企业组织形态的出现。逻辑分析还表明,后一种非交易成本逻辑的企业理论较科斯的企业理论更具根本性。 Following Coase's thought of constructing theory of the firm from uncertainty, this paper differentiates three types of uncertainty and respectively examines the logical of Coase's theory. Research shows that Coase's theory has a logical flaw under the first and the second kinds of uncertainty, and under the third kind, firm is the optimal organization form of maximizing the dynamic knowledge innovation ability. The logic analysis also indicates that the last theory of the firm without transaction cost idea is more foundamental than Coase's theory.
作者 雷国雄
出处 《河北经贸大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期23-26,共4页 Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
基金 西南政法大学2012年度校级重点项目"同情的经济分析--知识演化创新的视角"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 不确定性 知识创新 科斯企业理论 奈特企业理论 企业的本质 交易成本 知识创新 知识共享 Uncertainty Knowledge innovation Coase's theory of the firm Knight's theory of the firm Enterprise nature Transaction cost Knowledge innovation Knowledge sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Arrow K.J.Alterna tive Approaches to the The ory of Choice in Risk-Taking Situations[J].Econometrica,1951,(19):404-437.
  • 2Coase R.H.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937,(16):386-405.
  • 3Coase R.H.The Nature of the Firm:Meaning[A].Oliver E.Williamson,Sidney G.Winter.The Nature of the Firm:Origins,Evolution,and Development(Reprint Edition)[C].New York:Oxford University Press,1993:48-60.
  • 4Knight F.H.Risk,Uncertainty and Profit[M].New York:Houghton Mifflin and Co.1921.
  • 5Lin J.Y.The Needham Puzzle:Why the Industrial Revolution Did Not Originate in China[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,1995,(2):269-192.
  • 6North D.C.Understandi ng the Process of Economic Change[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2005.
  • 7Popper K.R.Objective Knowledge:A n Evolutionary Approach[M].London:Oxford University Press,1972.
  • 8Shackle G.L.S.Epistemics&Economics:a Critique of Economic Doctrines[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1972.
  • 9Simon Herbert A.Public Administration in Today's World of Organizations and Markets[J].Political Science and Politics,2000,(4):749-756.
  • 10UNESCO 2001.UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity[A].范俊军,编译,联合国教科文组织关于保护语言与文化多样性文件汇编[C].北京:民族出版社,2006.

共引文献6

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部