期刊文献+

当代中国的法律实证研究 被引量:45

Legal Empirical Research in Contemporary China
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对1979-2015年间中国法学核心期刊所发表论文及相关事实的实证研究,本文发现,法律实证研究已经在目前中国法学界获得了一席之地。研究者群体在壮大,成果在增加,问题意识已经辐射到法学研究的很多领域,关注点已经逐步向微观问题转移,影响面在扩大,并形成了一个相对较大的知识市场。知识的供给和需求共同作用推动了法律实证研究在当代中国的兴起,也造成了一定的"知识泡沫"。为了法律实证研究的长期健康发展,并对中国法学研究和法治建设做出更大贡献,本文主张法律实证研究者应该努力推动一个开放的学术共同体的建设,保持开放、多元、互补、合作的心态来对待其他类型的法学研究,以回应发现中国法治建设的真实问题、提供有效解决方案的历史使命。 Through an empirical research concerning legal articles published in core legal journals from 1979 to 2015, this article finds that the legal empirical research has significantly risen in China. The scholars in this field become strong, the empirical works increase, the empirical studies have covered a lot of legal fields, and all these works have more influences than ever before. In short, empirical data show that there is a large market concerning, although the demand and supply of knowledge promote the growth of legal empirical research in China, there are also some bubbles in this market. Accordingly, the article suggests that, in order to further develop legal empirical research and make more contributions to the establishment of rule of law in China, legal scholars shall keep open mind to other methods of legal studies and learn from the hatter.
作者 程金华
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期60-78,共19页 China Legal Science
基金 华东政法大学国际金融法律学院教授 国家社科基金青年项目(项目批准号:11CFX004) 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(编号:NCET-13-0802)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Theodore Eisenberg, "The Origins, Nature, and Promiseof Empirical Legal Studies and A Response to Concerns," University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2011, No. 5, pp. 1713-1738.
  • 2白建军.论法律实证分析[J].中国法学,2000(4):29-39. 被引量:111
  • 3Oliver Wendell Holmes, "The Path of the Law," Harvard Law Review, Vol. 110, 1997, p. 1001.
  • 4Thomas S. Ulen, "A Nobel Prize in Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work, and the Scientific Method in the Study of Law," University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2002, No. 4, pp. 875-920.
  • 5Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer eds. , The Oxlbrd Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 1-7.
  • 6Theodore Eisenberg :o Susan D. Franck, "Empiricism and International Law: Insights for Investment Treaty Dispute Resolution," Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2008, pp. 767-815.
  • 7Gregory Shaffer and Tom Ginsburg, " The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship," The American Journal of International Law. Vol. 106. No. 1. 2012. on. 1-46.
  • 8季卫东,齐海滨.系统论方法在法学研究中的应用及其局限——兼论法学方法论问题[J].中国社会科学,1987(1):167-180. 被引量:22
  • 9程金华:《奢侈的学术时尚:法律实证研究》,载《中国社会科学报》2012年5月9日.
  • 10季卫东.法律议论的社会科学研究新范式[J].中国法学,2015(6):25-41. 被引量:67

二级参考文献513

共引文献840

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部