期刊文献+

长沙地区引种牡丹品种综合性状评价 被引量:19

Evaluation on comprehensive characteristics of introduced Paeonia suffruticosa varieties in Changsha
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为给长沙及环境特点相近的高湿热地区牡丹品种的引种和选育工作提供研究依据,对长沙引种的116个牡丹品种,在调研的基础上采用层次分析法进行综合评价,以4个评价层次14个主要性状为研究对象,结合专家意见建立专家打分系统,对各品种资源进行定量评估,将这些品种资源划分为4个等级:分别为优、良、一般、差,最终得出每个品种的综合性状总评分。结果表明:I等(优)2个品种;II等(良)16个品种;III等(一般)78个品种;IV等(差)18个品种。 In order to provide a research basis for introduction, selection and breeding ofP. suffruticosa varieties in Changsha and high humid area with similar environmental characteristics, introduced 116P. suffruticosa varieties in Changsha were comprehensively evaluated, on the basis of the investigation conducted by the method of AHP comprehensive evaluation. 14 main characters of 4 hierarchical evaluation levels were taken as the research objects, an expert scoring system was established based on the opinions of the expert, and the varieties resources were quantitatively evaluated. The varieties resources were divided into the four grades: excellent, good, general, bad, and the scores of the comprehensive characteristics of each variety wereifnally obtained. The results showed that 2 varieties in I grade (excellent), 16 varieties in II grade (good), 78 varieties in III grade a (general), and 18 varieties in IV grade (bad).
出处 《经济林研究》 北大核心 2015年第4期81-85,共5页 Non-wood Forest Research
基金 林业公益性行业科研专项(201404710) 长沙市科技局重点项目(K1406010-21) 湖南省教育厅“十二五”重点学科资助项目(2011-76) 中南林业科技大学青年基金重点项目(QJ2012008A) 湖南省教育厅资助项目(13C1167)
关键词 牡丹 引种 评价 性状 peony introduction evaluation character
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献75

共引文献349

同被引文献189

引证文献19

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部