西南民族地区农村劳动力转移培训效应研究被引量：5

Effects Analysis of the Rural Labor Force Transferring Training Program in Southwestern Minority Nationality Areas

导出

摘要本文以云南民族地区农村住户调查数据为样本,利用半参数方法估计边际处理效应,测度了民族地区实施的劳动力培训项目效应。发现以下事实;边际处理效应(MTE)是不可观测的异质性变量UT的递减函数;农户培训的平均处理效应(ATE)为3.11%、参加培训的农户平均处理效应(TT)为7.88%、未参加培训的农户平均处理效应(TUT)为1.67%,参加培训的农户从转移培训中获得的收益最大,说明国家农村劳动力转移培训工程在西南民族地区实施的有效性。 This paper evaluates the effects of the Rural Labor Force Transferring Training Frogram in the case of southwestern minority nationality areas by using Yunnan＇ s Rural Household Survey data. The results show that, the Marginal Treatment Effect （MTE） is a decreasing function of the unobservable heterogeneity variable UT. In addition, the Average Treatment Effect （ATE） is 3.11 percent, the Treatment effect of the Treated （TT） for participants is 7.88 percent and the Treatment effect of the Untreated （TUT） for the nonparticipants is 1.67 percent, which demonstrates that households who participated in training gain the most. The results indicate that the Rural Labor Force Transferring Training Program is effective in southwestern minority nationality areas.

作者林浩谢佳春李兴绪

机构地区云南财经大学经济伦理研究所云南财经大学统计与数学学院

出处《数理统计与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期951-959,共9页 Journal of Applied Statistics and Management

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71263055)

关键词转移培训异质性处理效应半参数方法 transferring training, heterogeneity, treatment effect, semi-parametric method

分类号 F302.5 [经济管理—产业经济] O212 [理学—概率论与数理统计]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1James J Heckman,Xuesong Li.Selection bias,comparative advantage and heterogeneous returns to education:Evidence from China in 2000[J].Pacific Economic Review,2004,9(3):155-171.
2Shadish W R,Cook T D,Campbell D T.Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference[M].Boston:Houghton Mifflin,2002.
3Robert J LaLonde.The promise of public sector sponsored training programs[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(2):148-168.
4Marco Cliendo,Sabine Kopeinig.Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching[J].Journal of Economic Survey,2008,22(1):31-72.
5王海港,黄少安,李琴,罗凤金.职业技能培训对农村居民非农收入的影响[J].经济研究,2009,44(9):128-139. 被引量：132
6周亚虹,许玲丽,夏正青.从农村职业教育看人力资本对农村家庭的贡献--基于苏北农村家庭微观数据的实证分析[J].经济研究,2010,45(8):55-65. 被引量：130
7James J Heckman,Edward Vytlacil.Local instrumental variable and latent variable models for identifying and bounding treatment effects[A].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences[C].1999,96(8):4730-4734.
8James J Heckman,Edward Vytlacil.Structural equation,treatment effects,and economic policy evaluation[J].Econometrica,2005,73(3):669-738.
9James J Heckman.Micro data,heterogeneity,and the evaluation of public policy:Nobel lecture[J].Journal of Political Economy,2001,109(4):673-748.
10James J Heckman,Sergio Urzua,Edward Vytlacil.Understanding instrumental variables in models with essential heterogeneity[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,83(3):389-432.

二级参考文献37

1陈玉宇,邢春冰.农村工业化以及人力资本在农村劳动力市场中的角色[J].经济研究,2004,39(8):105-116. 被引量：122
2黄祖辉,俞宁.失地农民培训意愿的影响因素分析及其对策研究[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2007,37(3):135-142. 被引量：89
3Aakvik, Arild, James Heckman, Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Estimating Treatment Effects for Discrete Outcomes When Responses to Treatment Vary: An Application to Norwegian Vocational Rehabilitation Programs", Journal of Econometrics, 125:15--51.
4Bjorklund, Anders, Robert Moffitt, 1987, "The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-selection Models", Review of Economics and Statistics 69( 1 ) : 42--49.
5Carneiro, Pedro, James Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "Estimating the Return to Education When It Varies among Individuals", University of Chicago working paper.
6Ehrenberg, Ronald G. and Smith, Robert S., 2000, Modem Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Massachusetts.
7Friedlander, Daniel, David Greenberg, Philip Robins, 1997, " Evaluating Government Training Programs for the Economically Disadvantaged", Journal of Economlcs Literature, Vol. 45, No.4, pp. 1809--1855.
8Heekman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 1999, "Local Instrumental Variables and Latent Variable Models for Identifying and Bounding Treatment Effects", National Academy of Sciences 96, 4730--4734.
9Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2000, "The Relationship between Treatment Parameters within A Latent Variable Framework", Economics Letters 66( 1 ) :33--39.
10Heckman, James and Edward Vytlacil, 2005, "Structural Equations, Treatment Effects, and Economic Policy Evaluation", Econometrica, Vol. 73, No. 3 (May, 2005), 669--738.