期刊文献+

考虑供应风险和生产成本不确定性的供应链动态决策研究 被引量:11

Supply Chain Decisions with Endogenous Effort Toreduce Supply Uncertainty and Unit Production Cost
原文传递
导出
摘要 考虑到供应风险和生产成本的不确定性,本文研究了买方或卖方实施努力既可能改善供应可靠性,同时又可能降低生产成本的供应链最优决策问题。分别构建了制造商努力和供应商努力的两阶段动态决策模型。分析了提升供应可靠性和降低成本的概率对两种模型中的最优采购数量、最优努力程度和上下游期望收益以及供应链期望收益的影响。同时在两种模型的比较中发现,制造商的最优努力与供应商的最优努力之间的差异与收益分享系数有关。相同努力效果下,制造商努力时的最优采购数量总是不小于供应商努力时的最优采购数量。相比供应商努力,制造商努力更有利于增加其自身的期望收益。然而,供应商以及整个供应链的期望收益却可能在供应商努力时更高。 Considering supply risks and production cost uncertainty,the optimal decisions of a manufacturer and a supplier when either of them can initiate effort endogenously to enhance the supply reliability and reduce the production cost with certain probabilities is studied in this paper.Two dynamic programming models- the manufacture-initiated effort model and the supplier-initiated effort model- are designed separately.For each model,the impacts of the success probabilities on the optimal purchasing quantity are analyzed,on the optimal effort level,on the supplier's and manufacturer's expected profits,and on the expected total supply chain profit.By comparing the two models,It s found that whether the manufacturer s optimal effort is greater than that of the supplier depends on the revenue-sharing parameter.The optimal purchasing quantity in manufacturer-initiated effort model is not less than that in supplier-initiated effort model.And the expected profit of manufacturer is higher in the manufacturer-initiated effort model,but the expected profits of the supplier and the supply chain could be higher in the supplier-initiated effort model.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第11期56-61,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家青年拔尖人才支持计划 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471021 71472017 71071171 71002069) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0550) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(CQDXWL-2012-Z018 CQDXWL-2013-082 CQDXWL-2014-Z020)
关键词 供应风险 供应商努力 制造商努力 动态决策 supply risk supplier-initiated effort manufacturer-initiated effort dynamic decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Muthukrishnan R, Shulman J A. Understanding supplychain risk= A McKinsey global survey[J]. The McKin- sey Quarterly, 2006, (9) :1-9.
  • 2温源,肖勇波.面临汇率和供应风险的双渠道采购决策研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(4):35-43. 被引量:12
  • 3Wang Yimin, Gilland W, Tomlin B. Mitigating supply risk: Dual sourcing or process improvement[J]. Manu- facturing ~ Service Operations Management, 2010, 12 (3); 489-510.
  • 4Li C. Sourcing for supplier effort and competition.. De- sign of the supply base and pricing mechanism[J]. Man- agement Science, 2013, 59(6)~ 1389-1406.
  • 5Tang S Y, Gurnani H, Gupta D. Managing disruptions in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability ER]. Working Paper, University of Miami, 2013.
  • 6朱传波,季建华.考虑供应商风险的订货与可靠性改善策略研究[J].管理评论,2013,25(6):170-176. 被引量:12
  • 7Chang-Ran K. Toyota says supply chain will be ready by autumn for next big quake[Z/OL]. [2012- 03- 02]. http..//www, reuters, eom/artiele/2012/03/02/toyota- supply-chain-idUSL4E8E21ZJ20120302. 2012.
  • 8Wu Zhaohui, Choi Tr. Supplier-supplier relationships in the buyer-supplier triad~ Building theories from eight case studies [J]. Journal of Operations Management,2005, 24(1) :27-52.
  • 9Friedl G, Wagner S M. Supplier development or suppli- er switching ? [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2012,50(ll)~3066-3079.
  • 10鲁其辉,朱道立.供应链中产品与信息质量改进的战略联盟策略研究[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(10):79-88. 被引量:30

二级参考文献72

共引文献73

同被引文献65

  • 1鲁晓春,林正章.物流管理案例与实训[M].北京:北方交通大学出版社,2005:23-24.
  • 2石劫.丰田工厂关停时间延长天津爆炸或致减产万辆[EB/OL].(2015-08-24)[2015-10-18].http://au-to.huanqiu.corn/roll/2015-08/7345523.html.
  • 3SONG S T. Four Chinese Detained for Involvement in Mattel Toy Recall [EB/OL]. ( 2007-09-21 ) [2015-10-201. http://www, gov. cn/english/2007-09/21/con tent_758202, htm.
  • 4KARLIN S. One Stage Inventory Models with Un- eertainty[M]//ARROW K J, KARLIN S, SCARF H. Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958: 109-134.
  • 5HU X, GURNANI H, WANG L. Managing Risk of Supply Disruptions: Incentives for Capacity Restora- tion[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(1): 137-150.
  • 6WANG Y, GILLAND W, TOMLIN B. Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Manage- ment, 2010, 12(3): 489-510.
  • 7TANG Y S, KOUVELIS P. Supplier Diversification Strategies in the Presence of Yield Uncertainty and Buyer Competition[J]. Manufacturing & Service Op erations Management,2011,13(4) :439-451.
  • 8BABICH V, BURNETAS A N, RITCHKEN P H. Competition and Diversification Effects in Supply Chains with Supplier Default Risk[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2007, 9 (2) : 123-146.
  • 9YANG Z, AVDIN G, BABICH V, et al. Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option[J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(2): 192-209.
  • 10TOMLIN B. On the Value of Mitigation and Con tingency Strategies for Managing Supply-Chain Dis- ruption Risks [J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(5): 639-657.

引证文献11

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部