期刊文献+

基于三角模糊软集的FMEA风险评估方法 被引量:31

Risk evaluation method in FMEA based on triangular fuzzy soft sets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统失效模式与影响分析风险评估方法应用过程中不同专家模糊评价信息融合的问题,提出基于三角模糊软集的失效模式与影响分析风险评估方法。在失效模式与影响分析风险评估过程中,各评价专家选定失效模式风险评估指标集以及采用语言变量评估,利用三角模糊软集方法中AND运算对各评价专家的评价信息进行融合,分别获得失效模式风险评估三角模糊软集和风险因子融合指标权重。在去模糊化加权的基础上,计算失效模式比较决策表,得到失效模式的风险顺序。以某汽车生产设备的失效模式风险评估为例,验证了该方法的有效性和可靠性. A method based on triangular fuzzy soft sets was proposed for risk evaluation problems with integrating fuzzy assessment information of different experts in traditional Failure Mode and Effects Analysis(FMEA).In the process of FMEA risk evaluation,different sets of risk evaluation were selected by each expert,and linguistic variable evaluation was used to integrate the evaluating information by " AND" operation in triangular fuzzy soft sets.The triangular fuzzy soft set of risk evaluation in failure modes and integrated weights of risk factors were obtained respectively.The comparison decision table of failure modes was calculated and the risk priority of failure modes was determined.A case of risk evaluation of manufacturing facility in mobile industry was studied to illustrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期3054-3062,共9页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172055) 江西省教育厅科技资助项目(GJJ13313)~~
关键词 失效模式与影响分析 信息融合 三角模糊软集 风险因子 failure mode and effects analysis information integration triangular fuzzy soft sets risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1CHIN K S, CHAN A, YANG J B. Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008,36 (7) 633-649.
  • 2GEUM Y J, CHO Y, PARK Y. A systematic approach for di- agnosing service failure: service-specific FMEA and grey rela- tional analysis approach [J ]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2011,54(11/12) : 3126-3142.
  • 3李果,高建民,姜洪权.基于多色集合的多重故障建模与推理技术研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(4):643-648. 被引量:8
  • 4GILCHRIST W. Modeling failure mode and effect analysis [J]. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Manage- ment, 1993,10(5) : 16-23.
  • 5WANG Y M, CHIN K S, POO G K K, et al. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geo- metric mean[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36 (2) : 1195-1207.
  • 6BOWLES J B. An assessment of PRN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis[J]. Journal of the lEST, 2004,47(1) : 51-56.
  • 7伍晓榕,裘乐淼,张树有,孙良峰,郭传龙.模糊语境下的复杂系统关联FMEA方法[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2013,47(5):782-789. 被引量:21
  • 8LIU H C, LIU L, LIU N. Risk evaluation approaches in fail- ure mode and ezffects analysis: a literature review[J]. Expert Systems with Application, 2013,40 (2) : 828-838.
  • 9BRAGLIA M, FROSOLINI M, MONTANARI R. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality a- nalysis[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2003,19(5) :425-443.
  • 10TAY K M, LIM C P. Fuzzy FMEA with a guided rules re- duction system for prioritization of failures[J]. InternationalJournal o{ Quality and Reliability Management, 2006,23 (8) : 1047-1066.

二级参考文献73

共引文献70

同被引文献207

引证文献31

二级引证文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部