期刊文献+

过度自信、预期后悔情绪与国有企业高管职务舞弊行为的实验研究 被引量:4

An Experimental Study on the Overconfidence,Expected Regret and Occupational Fraud of Top Executives of State-owned Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文从行为经济学的视角,运用实验研究方法,探究了过度自信对国有企业高管职务舞弊行为的作用机理,以及在预期后悔情绪的影响下过度自信作用机理的变化规律。研究结果表明,过度自信会对国有企业高管的职务舞弊行为产生信息搜寻约束,高过度自信主体的职务舞弊倾向要显著大于低过度自信主体;负面的预期后悔情绪会显著抑制高过度自信主体的过度自信程度,从而降低该主体的职务舞弊倾向;正面的预期后悔情绪会显著增强低过度自信主体的过度自信程度,从而提高该主体的职务舞弊倾向。 Occupational fraud is an opportunistic behavior in nature affected by external factors and psychological factors.Previous studies are focused on the impact of external factors on occupational fraud,and lacking in psychological factors on the mechanism of occupational fraud.Overconfidence and regret emotion are the important psychological factors that affect the decision-making,and have significant influence on the occupational fraud behavior.Based on the behavioral economics,this paper explores the mechanism of overconfidence in the occupational fraud,and the influence of the regret emotion on the mechanism of overconfidence in the occupational fraud.The results show that overconfidence could constrain the search process of the fraud information,the fraud tendency of high degree overconfidence is bigger than the low degree overconfidence.Negative regret emotion could reduce the overconfidence tendency of the high fraud tendency,and restrain the fraud tendency.Positive regret emotion could increase the overconfidence tendency of the low fraud tendency,and increase the fraud tendency.
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第6期46-53,共8页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目"认知偏差视角下的国有企业CEO职务舞弊行为研究"(15BGL055)
关键词 国有企业高管 职务舞弊 过度自信 预期后悔情绪 实验室实验 top executives of state-owned enterprises occupational fraud overconfidence expected regret top executives of state-owned enterprises lab experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Agrawal, A., & Chadha, S. Corporate Governance and Ac- counting Scandals[J]. Journal of law and economics, 2005, 48 (2) : 371-406.
  • 2Sharer, W. E. Effects of materiality, risk, and ethical percep- tions on fraudulent reporting by financial executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 2002, 38(3): 241-260.
  • 3Krishnan, H. A. , Park, D. Effects of top management team change on performance in downsized US companies[J]. Management International Review, 1998(4) :303-319.
  • 4杜兴强,周泽将,修宗峰.政治联系与会计稳健性:基于中国民营上市公司的经验证据[J].经济管理,2009,35(7):115-121. 被引量:21
  • 5Goh, B. W. Audit Committees, Boards of Directors, and Re- mediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2009, 26(2): 549 - 579.
  • 6陈艳,孔晨,于洪鉴.行为人的舞弊心理及舞弊倾向的实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2014(9):92-99. 被引量:14
  • 7Heaton, J. B. Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1997, 31(2): 33-45.
  • 8Malmendier, U. , Tare, G. CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment[J]. Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(6): 2661 -2700.
  • 9Deshmukh, S. , Goe, A. , Howe, K. CEO Overconfidence and Dividend Policy, Working Paper, 2010.
  • 10Schrand, C. M., Zechman, S. L. C. Executive Overconfi- dence and the Slippery Slope to Financial Misreporting[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2011, 53(1); 311-329.

二级参考文献180

共引文献1181

同被引文献47

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部