期刊文献+

内部控制与外部责任:论政府绩效评估的目标定位 被引量:9

External Accountability vs Internal Control:On the Orientations of Government Performance Measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绩效评估的功能可从技术和价值两个层面来考察。前者可称为功能定位,后者则属于目标定位。目标定位角度可将绩效评估分为"内部控制"和"外部责任"两大类。发达国家外部责任型绩效评估具有三个特征:明确的外部责任意识;公民导向的评估指标体系;广泛深入的公民参与。我国内部控制型绩效评估表现在:政府主导和公民参与不足;自上而下的单向性特征;绩效评估沦为某种驾驭术。从内部控制向外部责任的转变,是政府绩效评估目标定位的未来方向。 The utilities of performance measurement (PM) can be seen from both lower-order technical and higher-order value perspectives. Value perspective implies the fundamental orientations of PM. Gov- ernment PM can be divided into two types from value perspective: external accountability and internal control. External accountability type of PM in developed countries has three main features : a clearly ar- ticulated sense of accountability; citizen-centered performance indicators; and active public participa- tion. Internal control orientation of PM in China demonstrates itself in three ways: government domi- nance and the lack of public participation; top-down and unidirectional approach in PM, and tactic use of PM as a tool of personnel reshuffle in some cases. A transformation of orientation of PM from internal control to external accountability therefore, should be a key task of reform in the foreseeable future.
作者 周志忍
出处 《北京电子科技学院学报》 2015年第3期1-8,共8页 Journal of Beijing Electronic Science And Technology Institute
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金重大招标项目"中国城市公用事业政府监管体系创新研究"(编号12&ZD211)资助 北京大学国家治理协同创新中心成果
关键词 绩效评估 目标定位 外部责任 内部控制 Performance Measurement Orientation of PM External Accountability Internal Control
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1奥斯本.盖布勒.改革政府一企业精神如何改革着公营部门[M],周敦仁.译,上海:上海译文出版社.1996.
  • 2Hatry, Harry P. Performance Measurement: Getting Results [ M ]. Washington, DC : Urban Institute. 1999.
  • 3Behn, Robert D. (2003) , Why Measure Per- formance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures [ J ] , Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 5. pp. 586-606.
  • 4马克.霍哲(Marc Holzer),张梦中.公共部门业绩评估与改善[J].中国行政管理,2000(3):36-40. 被引量:130
  • 5布朗,加勒,威廉斯.政府绩效审计[M],袁军.译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,1992:78.
  • 6Jackson, Peter M. (ed.), Measures for Success in the Public Sector, London: CIPFA. pp1995 : 19, 89.
  • 7OECD, In Search Of Results: Performance Management Practices, 1998.
  • 8周志忍.公共部门质量管理:新世纪的新趋势[J].国家行政学院学报,2000(2):40-44. 被引量:47
  • 9Department of Management and Budget, Fairfax County (VA) ( 2003 ) : Measures Up : A Manual for Performance Measurement (7th Edition).
  • 10Office of the City Coordinator, City of Minne- apolis, Performance Measurement: A New Model for Minneapolis, April 1999.

二级参考文献51

共引文献375

同被引文献117

引证文献9

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部