试析迈克尔逊-莫雷实验和光速不变原理

Analysis of the Michelson-Morley Experiment and the Permanent Principle of Light Velocity of the Theory of Relativity

提出利用证伪方法去甄别光行差与迈克逊-莫雷实验——历史上这两个矛盾命题的真伪;指出麦克斯韦设置的迈克逊-莫雷实验所假设光波与地球都相对"以太"介质运动的错误前提,是导致该实验失败主要原因;而斐兹杰拉——洛伦兹提出运动的地球参照系可带动"以太"的假设从而推导出来的洛伦兹变换仅仅是一个将错就错为了圆说一个伪命题的徒劳之举;还指出爱恩斯坦在没有定义光速之前就提出推理所不及的"光速不变原理"是有悖常理的,而目的就是为了重新包装"以太"观点的斐兹杰拉——洛伦兹变换从而引出相对论的理论,但爱恩斯坦始终无法改变洛伦兹变换的"以太"观点的逻辑推理过程;分析证明光速不变原理本身就是一个矛盾命题,最后尝试定义光速.

Falsified method is used to identify aberration of light and Michelson-Morley experiment——the two contradictory proposition in the history, to come up with a wrong premise that results in the failure of the exper-iment. It is in vain for Fiji＆#39;s Gerald- Lorenz to put forward that movement of the earth＆#39;s frame of reference will lead to ＆quot;ether＆quot; hypothesis which derived from Lorentz transformation because it is just a false proposition. It is also perverse for Albert Einstein to point out“Permanent principle of light velocity”before defining the speed of light. And his purpose is to repackage the Fiji’s Gerald- Lorenz viewpoint “ether” which leads to the theory of relativity. However,Albert Einstein still cannot change the logical reasoning process of Lorentz transformation of“ether”. Analysis shows that the permanent principle of light velocity itself is a contradiction proposition. Finally it attempts to define the speed of light.