期刊文献+

醋酸菌中CRISPR位点的比较基因组学与进化分析 被引量:1

Comparative genomics and evolutionary analysis of CRISPR loci in acetic acid bacteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 CRISPR(Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)是近几年发现的一种广泛存在于细菌和古菌中,能够应对外源DNA干扰(噬菌体、病毒、质粒等),并提供免疫机制的重复序列结构。CRISPR系统通常由同向重复序列、前导序列、间隔序列和CRISPR相关蛋白组成。本研究以醋酸发酵中常见3个属醋杆菌属(Acetobacter)、葡糖醋杆菌属(Gluconacetobacter)和葡糖杆菌属(Gluconobacter)的48个菌株为研究对象,通过其基因组上CRISPR相关基因序列的生物信息学分析,探索CRISPR位点在醋酸菌中的多态性及其进化模式。结果表明48株醋酸菌中有32株存在CRISPR结构,大部分CRISPR-Cas结构属于type I-E和type I-C类型。除了葡糖杆菌属外,葡糖醋杆菌属和醋杆菌属中的部分菌株含有II类的CRISPR-Cas系统结构(CRISPR-Cas9)。来自不同属菌株的CRISPR结构中重复序列具有较强的保守性,而且部分菌株CRISPR结构中的前导序列具有保守的motif(与基因的转录调控有关)及启动子序列。进化树分析表明cas1适合用于醋酸菌株的分类,而不同菌株间cas1基因的进化与重复序列的保守性相关,预示它们可能受相似的功能选择压力。此外,间隔序列的数量与噬菌体数量及插入序列(Insertion sequence,IS)数量有正相关的趋势,说明醋酸菌在进化过程中可能正不断受新的外源DNA入侵。醋酸菌中CRISPR结构位点的分析,为进一步研究不同醋酸菌株对醋酸胁迫耐受性差异及其基因组稳定性的分子机制奠定了基础。 The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat(CRISPR) is a widespread adaptive immunity system that exists in most archaea and many bacteria against foreign DNA, such as phages, viruses and plasmids. In general, CRISPR system consists of direct repeat, leader, spacer and CRISPR-associated sequences. Acetic acid bacteria(AAB) play an important role in industrial fermentation of vinegar and bioelectrochemistry. To investigate the polymorphism and evolution pattern of CRISPR loci in acetic acid bacteria, bioinformatic analyses were performed on 48 species from three main genera(Acetobacter, Gluconacetobacter and Gluconobacter) with whole genome sequences available from the NCBI database. The results showed that the CRISPR system existed in 32 species of the 48 strains studied. Most of the CRISPR-Cas system in AAB belonged to type I CRISPR–Cas system(subtype E and C), but type II CRISPR-Cas system which contain cas9 gene was only found in the genus Acetobacter and Gluconacetobacter. The repeat sequences of some CRISPR were highly conserved among species from different genera, and the leader sequences of some CRISPR possessed conservative motif, which was associated with regulated promoters. Moreover, phylogenetic analysis of cas1 demonstrated that they were suitable for classification of species. The conservation of cas1 genes was associated with that of repeat sequences among different strains, suggesting they were subjected to similar functional constraints. Moreover, the number of spacer was positively correlated with the number of prophages and insertion sequences, indicating the acetic acid bacteria were continually invaded by new foreign DNA. The comparative analysis of CRISR loci in acetic acid bacteria provided the basis for investigating the molecular mechanism of different acetic acid tolerance and genome stability in acetic acid bacteria.
出处 《遗传》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期1242-1250,共9页 Hereditas(Beijing)
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:3117175) 浙江省自然科学基金(编号:LY14C060001)资助
关键词 醋酸菌 CRISPR 重复序列 遗传进化 acetic acid bacteria CRISPR repeat sequence genetic evolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Illeghems K, Vuyst LD, Weckx S. Complete genome se- quence and comparative analysis of Acetobacter pasteu- rianus 386B, a strain well-adapted to the cocoa bean fer- mentation ecosystem. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14: 526.
  • 2Azuma Y, Hosoyama A, Matsutani M, Furuya N, Horika- wa H, Harada T, Hirakawa H, Kuhara S, Matsushita K, Fujita N, Shirai, M. Whole-genome analyses reveal ge- netic instability of Acetobacter pasteurianus. Nucl Acids Res, 2009, 37(17): 5768-5783.
  • 3Matsutani M, Hirakawa H, Saichana N, Soemphol W, Ya- kushi T, Matsushita K. Genome-wide phylogenetic analy- sis of differences in thermotolerance among closely re- lated Acetobacter pasteurianus strains. Microbiology, 2012, 158(Pt 1): 229-239.
  • 4Hambly E, Suttle CA. The viriosphere, diversity, and ge- netic exchange within phage communities. Curr Opin Mi- crobiol, 2005, 8(4): 444450.
  • 5Matsutani M, Hirakawa H, Yakushi T, Matsushita K. Ge- home-wide phylogenetic analysis of Glueonobacter, Aee- tobacter, and Gluconacetobacter. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2011, 315(2): 122-128.
  • 6Heler R, Marraffini LA, Bikard D. Adapting to new threats the generation of memory by CRISPR-Cas immune sys- tems. Mol Microbiol, 2014, 93(1): 1-9.
  • 7李君,张毅,陈坤玲,单奇伟,王延鹏,梁振,高彩霞.CRISPR/Cas系统:RNA靶向的基因组定向编辑新技术[J].遗传,2013,35(11):1265-1273. 被引量:84
  • 8李铁民,杜波.CRISPR-Cas系统与细菌和噬菌体的共进化[J].遗传,2011,33(3):213-218. 被引量:33
  • 9Barrangou R, Marraffini LA. CRISPR-Cas systems: Pro- karyotes upgrade to adaptive immunity. Mol Cell, 2014, 54(2): 234-244.
  • 10Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007, 8: 172.

二级参考文献51

  • 1Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science, 2008, 322(5909): 1843-1845.
  • 2Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(3): 181-190.
  • 3Mojica FJM, D I ez-Villasefior C, Garc ~ a-Mart f nez J, A1- mendros C. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology, 2009, 155(Pt 3): 733-740.
  • 4Brouns SJJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M, Westra ER, Slijkhuis RJ, Snijders APL, Dickman MJ, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, van der Oost J. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in orokarvotes. Science, 2008, 321(5891): 960-964.
  • 5Hale CR, Zhao P, Olson S, Duff MO, Graveley BR, Wells L, Terns RM, Terns MP. RNA-guided RNA cleavage by a CRISPR RNA-Cas protein complex. Cell, 2009, 139(5): 945-956.
  • 6Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. Self versus non-self discrimi- nation during CRISPR RNA-directed immunity. Nature, 463(7280): 568-571.
  • 7Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science, 2010, 327(5962): 167-170.
  • 8Heidelberg JF, Nelson WC, Schoenfeld T, Bhaya D. Germ warfare in a microbial mat community: CRISPRs provide in- sights into the co-evolution of host and viral genomes. PLoS One, 2009, 4(1): e4169.
  • 9Wilmes P, Simmons SL, Denef VJ, Banfield JF. The dynamic genetic repertoire of microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2009, 33(1): 109-132.
  • 10Greve B, Jensen S, Br ia gger K, Zillig W, Garrett RA. Ge- nomic comparison of archaeal conjugative plasmids from Sulfolobus. Archaea, 2004, 1 (4): 231-239.

共引文献109

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部