期刊文献+

水产品的真伪鉴别与评价技术研究进展 被引量:5

Research Progress on Technology for Authenticity Identification and Evaluation of Aquatic Products
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国水产品产量大,种类多,不同品种间的品质和价格差异悬殊,致使市场上的水产品尤其是高值水产品掺杂使假、以次充好、错误标识等现象频发,严重损害消费者利益,给健康带来了风险,传统的鉴别方法存在主观性和片面性,方法不易标准化的缺点,因此亟需建立有效、客观和快速的水食品真伪鉴别与评价技术。综述了主要水产品的真伪鉴别与评价技术,包括感官鉴别、仿生感官评价技术、光谱和色谱鉴别技术以及基于核酸和蛋白质的鉴别技术等,比较了上述方法的优缺点,对水产品的真伪鉴别与评价技术研究进行了展望。 The yield and varieties of aquatic products in China is large and abundant. Due to the differences between quality and price of various aquatic products are huge,the phenomenon such as adulterated,shoddy and false identification flooded in the aquatic markets,especially the high-valued aquatic products. These problems not only infringe the rights of consumers,but also bring the risk of health to consumers. The traditional identification methods are subjective,one-sided,and difficult to be standardized. So establishing an effective,reliable,objective and rapid authenticity identification and evaluation method for aquatic products is an urgent task. This paper expounded the main authenticity identification methods,including sensory identification,bionic sensory evaluation,based on nucleic acid and protein detection techniques,spectroscopic and chromatographic identification technology. The paper also compared the advantages and disadvantages of these methods,and prospected the studies on technology of authenticity identification and evaluation of aquatic products.
出处 《中国农业科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期111-117,共7页 Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD17B01)资助
关键词 水产品 真伪 鉴别 评价 进展 aquatic product authenticity identification evaluation research progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Marko P B, Lee S C, Rice A M, et al.. Mislabelling of a depleted reef fish [J]. Nature, 2004, 430: 309-310.
  • 2Lamendin R, aren Miller K, Ward R D. Labelling accuracy in Tasrnanian seafood: An investigation using DNA barcoding [J]. Food Control, 2015, 47: 436-443.
  • 3李新光,王璐,赵峰,马丽萍,孙永,周德庆.DNA条形码技术在鱼肉及其制品鉴别中的应用[J].食品科学,2013,34(18):337-342. 被引量:39
  • 4Hanner R, Becker S, Ivanova N V, et al.. FISH-BOL and seafood identification: Geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada [ J ]. Mitochondrial DNA, 2011, 22: 106-122.
  • 5Miller D M, Mariani S. Smoke, mirrors and mislabelled cod: Poor transparency in the European seafood industry [ J]. Front. Ecol. Environ., 2010, 8: 517-521.
  • 6Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Fetxi E, et al.. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitution s in shark seafood products: the Italian case of "palombo" (Mustelus) [ J]. Food Res. Int., 2010, 43: 376-381.
  • 7Filonzi L, Chiesa S, Vaghi M, et al.. Molecular barcoding reveals mislabelling of commercial fish products in Italy [ J ]. Food Res. Int., 2010, 43: 1383-1388.
  • 8Maehado-Schiaffino G, Martinez J L, Garcia-Vazquez E. Detection of mislabelling in hake seafood employing mtSNPs- based methodology with identification of eleven hake species of the genus Merluccius [ J]. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56: 5091-5095.
  • 9Cawthorn D M, Steinman H A, Witthuhn R C. A high incidence of species substitution and mislabelling detected in meat products sold in South Africa [ J]. Food Res. Int., 2013, 32 : 440-449.
  • 10中华人民共和国农业部渔业渔政管理局.中国渔业统计年鉴[C].北京:中国农业出版社,2014.

二级参考文献282

共引文献434

同被引文献114

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部