期刊文献+

近二十年搭桥照应研究的回顾与思考 被引量:3

A Critical Review of Two Decades of Research on Bridging Inferences
原文传递
导出
摘要 近二十来国内外学者从各个领域对搭桥照应进行了研究和解释,取得了丰硕的成果。但各种研究都存在其缺陷和漏洞。纵向比较而言,分段式语篇表征理论(SDRT)采用语义学和语用学之所长,为搭桥照应的消解机制提供了一个较为全面的视角,解决了其它理论所不能解决的问题。但这一理论对搭桥照应的解释仍存在两个严重缺陷:其一,语篇关系的定义和分类标准不明确;其二,对于语篇关系在质和量上的级差性,以及这种差异性对语篇连贯的影响,SDRT没有给出充分的理据。 There has been a considerable amount of research on bridging in various fields. Although these studies are fruitful, there are still some limitations with each of them. The approach to bridging in SDRT provides the most exten- sive basis for drawing bridging inferences in an interplay of linguistic and contextual knowledge to explain much of the otherwise unsolved linguistic phenomena. However, in order to be more persuasive, this theory needs to be improved in two aspects. A clear definition and succinct criteria for the categorization of each rhetoric relation need to be estab- lished. Additionally, the qualitative and quantitative differences in rhetoric relations and the influence on the coher- ence of the utterance need to be proved systematically.
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期98-107,共10页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(武汉理工大学自主创新研究基金项目 项目编号:2013-Ib-013)的阶段性成果
关键词 搭桥照应 分段式语篇表征理论 框架网络 bridging SDRT FrameNet
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Asher, N. & A. Lascarides. Bridging [J]. Journal of Semantics, 1998, 15( 1 ) : 83 - 113.
  • 2Asher, N. & A. Lascarides. Logics of Conversation [ M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 3Asher, N. & L. Vieu. Surbordinating and coordinating discourse relations [ J]. Lingua, 2005, 115 : 591 - 610.
  • 4Charolles, M. Associative anaphora and its interpretation [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1999, 31:311 -326.
  • 5Christophersen, P. The Articles : A Study of Their Theory and Use in English [ M ]. London : Oxford University Press, 1939.
  • 6Clark, H. H. Bridging [ C]//Wason P. & P. Johnson-Laird. Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1977.411 - 420.
  • 7Erku, F. & J. Gundel. Indirect anaphors [ C ]//Verschueren J. & M. Bertuccelli-Papi. The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 1987. 533 - 546.
  • 8Fraurud, K. Definiteness and the processing of noun phrases in natural discourse [ J ]. Journal of Semantics, 1990, (7) : 395 -433.
  • 9Freitas, S. Interpretacao Automatizada de Textos : Processamento de Anaforas [ D ]. Vitoria: Universidade Fed- eral do Espirito Santo, 2005.
  • 10Gardent, C, Manuelian, H. & E. Kow. Which bridges for bridging definite descriptions? [ R]. 4^th International Workshop on Linguistically interpreted Corpora - LINC'03 . Budapest, 2003.

二级参考文献103

共引文献54

同被引文献8

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部