企业技术创新行为的演化博弈及对种业创新困境的解释被引量：5

Evolutionary Gaming of Companies' Technological Innovation Behavior and the Analysis on the Plight of Seed Industry Innovation

下载PDF

导出

摘要鉴于我国种业发展存在创新水平低、"套牌"和假冒伪劣产品充斥市场等问题,利用演化博弈理论的方法,对我国种业创新企业的创新行为进行演化博弈分析,并对我国种业创新困境进行解释,主要结论如下,知识产权保护制度不完善导致"柠檬市场";种业市场虚假繁荣下面临技术扩散约束;低市场集中度约束了模仿企业创新投入和市场定价能力;消费者偏好保守不利于种业企业创新的增加;企业的短见对种业创新产生约束。 As China＇s seed industry is under low level innovation,and counterfeit products are prevailing,this paper analyzed the firms＇ innovation behaviors and used Evolutionary Game Theory to predict the factors influencing companies group innovation behavior so as to analyze the innovation dilemma. The conclusions are as follows： firstly,imperfect intellectual property protection system leads to ＂Lemon Market＂; secondly,technology diffusion is constrained under false prosperity market; thirdly,low market concentration constrains the imitative innovation companies＇ RD investment and pricing ability; fourthly,consumers ＇ risk avoidance preference negatively influences the companies ＇ innovation; finally,shortsighted companies constrain the industry innovation.

作者张哲

机构地区中国社会科学院研究生院

出处《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第24期158-164,共7页 Science and Technology Management Research

关键词原始创新模仿演化博弈种业 original innovation imitate evolutionary gaming seed industry

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理] F224.32 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1AGHION P, HOWITF P. A model of growth through creative destruc- tion [ R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1990.
2CASWELL M F, ZILBERMAN D. The effects of well depth and land quality on the choice of irrigation technology [ J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1986, 68 (4) : 798 -811.
3FEDER G, JTST R E, ZILBERMAN D. Adoption of agricultural in- novations in developing countries: A survey [ J ]. Economic develop- ment and cultural change, 1985:255 -298.
4FREEMAN C, SOETS L. The economics of industrial innovation [ M]. Psychology Press, 1997.
5HUFFMAN W E, EVENSON R E. Contributions of public and pri- vate science and technology to US agricultural produetivity [ J ]. A- meriean Journal of Agricultural Eeonomies, 1992, 74 (3): 751 -756.
6FERNANDEZ - CORNEJO J, SCHIMMELPFENNIG D. Have seed industry changes affected research eftort[ J ]. Amber Waves, 2007 (2) : 4 -9.
7MANSFIELD E, SCHWARTZ M, WAGNER S. Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study [ J]. The Economic Journal, 1981 : 907 -918.
8MAGNIER A, KALAITZANDONAKES N, MILLER D J. Product life cycles and innovation in the US seed corn industry [ J ]. Interna- tional food and agribusiness management review, 2010, 13 (3) : 17 - 36.
9NELSON R R, WINTER S G. Neoclassical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth : critique and prospectus [ J ]. The Economic Jour- nal, 1974:886-905.
10ROBINSON W T, FORNELL C. Sources of market pioneer advanta- ges in consumer goods industries [ J ]. Journal of Marketing Re- search, 1985 : 305 - 317.