期刊文献+

中文版生活效能量表在评价军人心理行为训练效果中的信效度研究 被引量:2

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Life Effectiveness Questionnaire for Evaluating the Military Psychological Behavior Training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:修订英文版生活效能量表(LEQ-H),并评价其信效度,为军人心理行为训练效果评价提供参考工具。方法:翻译并形成中文版生活效能量表,通过专家评价、大样本调查,对量表的内容效度、结构效度、判别效度、内部一致性、重测信度及分半信度进行分析。结果:中文版生活效能量表内容效度良好,具有较好的模型拟合,判别效度满意,重测信度和分半信度均较好。结论:中文版生活效能量表用于军人心理行为训练效果评价,具有良好的信效度,可作为有效的评估工具。 To translate the English version of Life Effectiveness Questionnaire(LEQ-H)into Chinese version,and to evaluate its reliability and validity for evaluating the military psychological behavior training.Methods:Translate the English version of LEQ-H into Chinese version,and evaluate the LEQ-H for its content validity,construct validity,discriminant validity,internal consistency,test-retest reliability and split-half reliability through expert evaluation,large sample survey and data analysis.Results:Chinese version of LEQ-H consists of six factors which constituting 24 entries.The validity of its content is good,which proved its model fit is good,and its discriminated validity is successful for every factor,and the good test-retest reliability and split-half reliability.Conclusion:The Chinese version of LEQ-H for military psychological and behavioral training evaluating had good reliability and validity,and can be used as an effective assessment tool.
作者 陈增辉 杜江
出处 《军事体育学报》 2015年第4期81-85,共5页 Journal of Military Physical Education and Sports
基金 第三军医大学人文社科基金项目(2012XRW19)
关键词 生活效能 本土化 军人心理行为训练 life effectiveness localization military psychological and behavioral training
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Neill J T, Marsh H W, Richards G E. The Life Effectiveness Ques- tionnaire: Development and psychometrics [Z] .University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia., 2003.
  • 2WangJ C, Neill J T, Liu W, et al.Project work and life skills: Psychometric properties of the Life Effectiveness Questionnaire for project work [J].Educational Research Journal, 2008, 23 ( 1 ) :21--43.
  • 3J. W C K, T. N J, C. L W, et al. Project work and life skills: psy- ehometrie properties of the Life Effectiveness Questionnaire for pro- ject work [J] .Educational Research Journal, 2008, 23: 21--43.
  • 4Neill J T. The Life Effectiveness Questionnaire: A Tool for Measur- ing Chang [Z] . University of Canberra, Australia., 2000.
  • 5史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):152-155. 被引量:1062
  • 6陈增辉,孟涛,杨杰.军人心理行为训练分析[J].体育文化导刊,2011(1):156-158. 被引量:16

二级参考文献24

  • 1武欣,吴志明.团队共享心智模型的影响因素与效果[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):542-549. 被引量:56
  • 2刘惠军,郭德俊,李宏利,高培霞.成就目标定向、测验焦虑与工作记忆的关系[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):254-261. 被引量:58
  • 3Ellis H C, Ashbrook P N. Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory[M]//Fielder K, Forgas J, ed. Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior. Toronto, Ontario, Canda: Hogrefe, 1988.
  • 4Lang P J, Davis M, Ohman A. Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology[J]. Journal Affect Disorder, 2000, 61 (3) : 137-159.
  • 5Izard C E, Youngstrom E A. The activation and regulation of fear and anxiety[J]. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1996, Vol. 43: 1-59.
  • 6Prochaska J M, Norcross J C, Di Clemente C C. Changing for good[M]. New York: Avon Books, Inc, 1994: 21-35.
  • 7Epstein R, et al. "Insight" in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance [J]. Nature, 1984: 61-62.
  • 8Cohen S G, Bailey D E. What makes teams work: Group effectives research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997(23): 239-290.
  • 9MarksM A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S J. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 2001 (26): 356-376.
  • 10Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.

共引文献1076

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部