期刊文献+

Lichtenstein术式和腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前间隙术式在复发性腹股沟疝修补中的应用比较 被引量:20

Comparison of Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用Lichtenstein和经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)术式在传统复发性腹股沟疝修补术中的价值。方法采用前瞻性的随机对照试验,选取2009年1月至2013年12月绍兴市人民医院收治的56例复发性腹股沟疝患者,随机分为Lichtenstein组(29例)和TAPP组(26例)。比较二组术前、术中、术后疗效的相关因素。结果 Lichtenstein组和TAPP组平均手术时间相比,差异无统计学意义[(51±6)min vs(53±6)min,P=0.338]。TAPP组相比Lichtenstein组,术后疼痛较轻[(1.9±1.0)分vs(3.0±1.3)分,P<0.001]。Lichtenstein组有7例出现术后并发症(感染、血肿、浆液肿、尿潴留),而在TAPP组有8例出现并发症(血肿、浆液肿、尿潴留),二组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.585)。二组在随访期间均无疝复发。Lichtenstein组有5例(17.2%)在术后6个月时仍存在术后慢性疼痛,TAPP组3例(11.6%),二组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.829)。结论对于应用传统修补方法 (无补片)复发的腹股沟疝的治疗,应该首选TAPP,但如果不能进行腹腔镜手术,Lichtenstein手术也是一种选择。 Objective To compare outcomes of two procedures for recurrent inguinal hernia following traditional suture repair: Lichtenstein repair vs TAPP repair. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted,and in total,56 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia in Shaoxing People' s Hospital,Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University,from January 2011 to December 2013,were randomly assigned to two groups: 29 patients in Lichtenstein group and 26 patients in TAPP group. Preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative factors were compared between the two groups. Results Average operation time for Lichtenstein group was( 50. 9 ± 6. 1) minutes,compared with( 52. 5 ± 6. 2) minutes for TAPP patients,but the difference did not reach statistical significance( P = 0. 338). In TAPP group,the patients had less pain in the postoperative period than those in Lichtenstein group [( 1. 9 ± 1. 0) scores vs( 3. 0 ±1. 3) scores,P 0. 001]. In the Lichtenstein group,a total of 7 postoperative complications( infection,hematoma,seroma,urinary retention) were observed,compared with 8 in the TAPP group( P = 0. 585).There were no cases of hernia recurrence during the follow-up period. Chronic pain( more than 6 months after the operation) developed in 5 patients from the Lichtenstein group( 17. 2%) and in 3 patients from the TAPP group( 11. 6%),but the difference was not significant( P = 0. 829). Conclusion For the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias following traditional repair( no mesh),TAPP repair should be the first choice.If there are any contraindications for the laparoscopy,Lichtenstein repair shows to be an alternative.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2015年第6期15-18,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹股沟 疝修补术 经腹腹膜前疝修补术 Lichtenstein技术 腹腔镜检查 Hernia inguinal Herniorrhaphy TAPP Lichtenstein repair Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Nordin P, Haapaniemi S, van Der Linden W, et al. Choice of anesthesia and risk of reoperation for recurrence in groin hernia repair [J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(1) : 187-192.
  • 2Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordea A, et al. Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases [ J]. Hernia, 2003, 7(3) : 125-129.
  • 3Schumpelick V, Fitzgibbons RJ. Recurrent Herein Prevention and Treatment [ M ]. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2007.
  • 4Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines of the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients [J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4) : 343-403.
  • 5Haapaniemi S, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, et al. Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair[J]. Ann Surg, 2001, 234(1) : 122-126.
  • 6Neumayer L, Giobbie- Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hemia[ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(18): 1819-1827.
  • 7Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedure vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Surg Endosc, 2005, 19(2) : 188-199.
  • 8Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, et al. Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair[ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21 (4) : 634-640.
  • 9McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003( 1 ) : CD001785.
  • 10Liehtenstein IL, Sehulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-free hernioplasty[J]. Ann J Surg, 1989, 157(2) :188-193.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Mccormack K.Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair[DB/OL].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2003,CD001785.
  • 2Simons MP,Aufenacker T,Bay-Nielsen M,et al.European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia.2009,13(4):343-403.
  • 3孙延军,李健文,郑民华,蒋渝,王明亮,陆爱国,胡伟国.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein术的对比研究[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2007,1(1):21-24. 被引量:7

共引文献6

同被引文献132

  • 1肖乾虎.无张力疝修补术后复发的原因及对策[J].外科理论与实践,2005,10(2):113-114. 被引量:65
  • 2唐健雄.无张力疝修补手术后复发与手术者的相关因素[J].临床外科杂志,2006,14(11):686-687. 被引量:84
  • 3Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open procedure in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of the results[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 207(4) :602-612.
  • 4Itani KM, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Awad SS, et al. Management of recurrent inguinal hernias [ J ]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009,209 (5) : 653-658.
  • 5Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia [ J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97 ( 1 ) : 4- 11.
  • 6Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-free hemioplasty ~J]. Am J Surg, 1989, 157(2) 188-193.
  • 7Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et ah Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients [ J]. Hernia, 2014, 18 (2) : 152- 163.
  • 8Karatepe O, Acet E, Ahiok M, et at. Preperitoneal repair ( open posterior approach) for recurrent inguinal hernias previously treated with Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty [J]. Hippokratia, 2010, 14(2) 119-121.
  • 9Willaert W, De Bacquer D, Rogiers X, et al. Open preperitoneal techniques versus lichtenstein repair for elective inguinal hernias [ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012,7: CD008034.
  • 10Saber A, Hokkam EN, Ellabban GM. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for recurrent inguinal hernia: a randomized trial [J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2015, 11(2) 123-128.

引证文献20

二级引证文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部