择期髋关节置换的老年患者低诺顿量表评分和术后并发症的关系被引量：1

导出

摘要目的： Norton评分系统是用于评价压力性溃疡危险的工具,本研究目的在于观察低诺顿量表评分和择期髋关节置换手术后并发症之间的关系。方法2009年1月至2011年12月,年龄65岁以上择期髋关节置换患者作为研究对象,166例中女性108例,24例具有低诺顿量表评分（≤16）。结果低诺顿量表评分患者与高诺顿量表评分患者比较除了压力性溃疡外,手术后并发症较多（0.7±0.5对0.4±0.2,P〈0.05）。回归分析显示低诺顿量表评分与手术后并发症独立相关（ P〈0.05）。结论除了可预测压力性溃疡危险性外,诺顿量表亦可用于老年髋关节置换的手术后并发症预测。

作者付淑红

机构地区河南鹤壁煤业公司总医院骨科

出处《国际护理学杂志》 2015年第23期3200-3202,共3页 international journal of nursing

关键词诺顿量表评分老年手术后并发症预测髋关节置换

分类号 R473.6 [医药卫生—护理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1Postler A, Neidel J, Gtinther KP, et al. Incidence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction and other adverse events in elderly patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) . Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2011, 53 (3): 328-333.
2Alfonso DT, Toussaint R J, Alfonso BD, et al. Nonsurgical complications after total hip and knee arthroplasty [ J . Am J Orthop, 2006, 35 (11): 503-510.
3Keong N, Ricketts D, Alakeson N, et al. Pressure sores following elective total hip arthroplasty: pitfalls of misinterpreta- tion [J]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 2004, 86 (3) : 174-176.
4Griesdale DE, Neufeld J, Dhillon D, et al. Risk factors for u- rinary retention after hip or knee replacement: a cohort study [J] . Can J Anaesth, 2011, 58 (12) : 1097-1104.
5Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement [ J . J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85 (1) : 20-26.
6Gold A, Sever R, Lerman Y, et al. Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) and postoperative complications following hip fracture surgery in the elderly [ J 1. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012, 55 (1): 173-176.
7Sever R, Gold A, Segal O, et al. Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) are associated with post-operative complica- tions following spine fracture surgery in the elderly [ J 1. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2012, 55 (1) : 177-180.
8Baath C, Hall-Lord ML, Idvall E, et al. Interrater reliability using Modified Norton scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form -Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice . J Clin Nurs, 2008, 17 (5) : 618- 626.
9Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcia-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, et al. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review (J. J Adv Nurs, 2006, 54 (1): 94- 110.
10Anthony D, Parboteeah S, Saleh M, et al. a review of the lit- erature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2008, 17 (5): 646-653.