期刊文献+

危急值不同告警方式对响应时间影响的分析研究 被引量:4

The Analysis and Research of the Influence of Different Ways of Critical Value Alarm on Response Time
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨护士(医生)工作站危急值图标闪烁提醒和弹窗全屏置顶两种不同告警方式对于住院患者危急值响应时间影响,优化危急值报告流程。方法采集某院分别使用图标闪烁和弹窗置顶两种危急值告警方式各一个月危急值报告记录,计算危急值临床响应时间,采用独立样本t检验进行统计学分析。结果采用弹窗全屏置顶方式告警临床平均响应时间为7.97±6.65分钟,采用图标闪烁提醒方式平均响应时间为10.65±9.77分钟,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论基于医院信息系统的危急值报告流程采用弹窗全屏置顶方式能够缩短平均响应时间,提高接收及时性,保障患者安全。 Objective To discuss the effect of two different alarm ways(icon flash to remind and pop-up full screen placed at the top)of critical value in nurse(doctor) workstation on response time of inpatients, optimize the critical value reporting process. Methods Collecting critical value report records of two ways each one month,calculating the clinical response time, using independent sample test for statistical analysis. Results Using pop-up full screen placed at the top way alarm clinical average response time is 7.97 + 6.65 minutes, using icon flash to remind way alarm clinical average response time is 10.65±9.77 minutes, P0.05, has statistical significance.Conclusion Critical value reporting process based on hospital information system using pop-up full screen placed at the top to shorten the average response time, improve the receiving timely, to ensure the safety of patients.
出处 《中国病案》 2015年第12期32-34,共3页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 危急值 医院信息 系统 Critical value Hospital information System
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献35

  • 1陆骥.LIS与HIS的系统集成设计[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(2):36-37. 被引量:13
  • 2王延青.电子病历与医院信息化管理[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(4):381-381. 被引量:26
  • 3杨伟.LIS系统与HIS系统的接口实现[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2006,19(10):1713-1714. 被引量:15
  • 4梅立军,付小龙,刘启新,沈锡臣.基于SOA的数据交换平台研究与实现[J].计算机工程与设计,2006,27(19):3601-3603. 被引量:70
  • 5吴卫国,王尚生.实验室信息系统(LIS)设计与功能[J].医疗设备信息,2007,22(3):39-41. 被引量:25
  • 6Kost G J, Hale K N. Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 49(2): 167-176.
  • 7Barenfanger J, Sautter R L, Lang D L, et al. hnproving patient safety by repeating (read-back) telephone reports of critical information[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2004, 121(6): 801 803.
  • 8Valenstein P N, Wagar E A, Stankovic A K, et id. Notification of crit- ical results: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 121 institutions[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2008, 132(12): 1862-1867.
  • 9Parl F F, O' Leary M F, Kaiser A B, et ol. hnplementation of a closed- loop reporting system for critical values and clinical communication in compliance with goals of the joint commission [J]. Clin Chem, 2010, 56 (3): 417-423.
  • 10Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Zaninotto M, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 131(3): 432-441.

共引文献94

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部