期刊文献+

微创小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎47例临床效果分析 被引量:11

Clinical Effect Analysis of 47 Cases of Acute Appendicitis Treated With Minimally Invasive Small Incision Appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析微创小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床效果。方法将我院收治的93例急性阑尾炎患者随机分为两组,实验组47例给予微创小切口阑尾切除术治疗,对照组46例给予传统阑尾切除术治疗。结果实验组手术时间[(25.17±5.28)min]、术中出血量[(27.15±6.29)ml]、肛门排气时间[(21.13±2.18)h]、住院时间[(4.88±1.10)d]少于对照组[手术时间(44.32±6.17)min、术中出血量(107.57±11.35)ml、肛门排气时间(39.68±8.98)h、住院时间(12.15±2.24)d],其术后并发症发生率(8.51%)低于对照组(32.61%),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎,可取得理想的效果,术中及术后情况较佳,术后并发症少。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of minimally invasive small incision appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods 93 cases of acute appendicitis in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group of 47 cases were treated with minimally invasive incision appendectomy, 46 cases in the control group were treated with conventional appendectomy. Results The operation time of the experimental group [(25.17±5.28) min], the amount of bleeding [(27.15±6.29) ml], anal exhaust time [(21.13±2.18) h], hospitalization time [(4.88±1.10) d] was less than that of the control group [(44.32±6.17) min, and the amount of bleeding(107.57±11.35) ml], the time of anus exhaust(39.68±8.98) h, hospitalization time(12.15±2.24) d], the incidence of postoperative complications(8.51%) was lower than that of the control group(32.61%), the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive small incision appendectomy for acute appendicitis, can achieve the desired results, and the postoperative situation is better, less postoperative complications.
作者 赵嵘
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第32期75-76,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 急性阑尾炎 微创小切口阑尾切除术 临床效果 Acute appendicitis Minimally invasive small incision appendectomy Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献39

  • 1王育和,刘家峰,徐大华,李非,孙家邦.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1184-1185. 被引量:78
  • 2高根五,夏志平,姚榛祥.临床普通外科学[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,2004.
  • 3吴阶平 裘法祖主编.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民出版社,1994.26-27.
  • 4谢桂生,韦涌初.麦氏小切口阑尾切除术452例体会[J].微创医学,2007,2(5):420-422. 被引量:14
  • 5Richards W, Watson D, Lynch G, et al. A review of the re-sults of lap- aroscopic versus open appendectomy[J]. Surgery Gynecology and Obs- tetrics, 1993,177(5):473-48.
  • 6Aziz N, Fahey JL, Detels R, et al. Analytical performance of a highly sensitive Creactive protein-based immunoassay and the effects of labo- ratory variables on levels of protein in blood[J]. Clinical and Diagnos- tic Laboratory Immunology, 2003, 10(4): 652-657.
  • 7Tsao K J, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, et al. Adhesive small bowel obstruc- tion after appendectomy in children: Comparison between the laparoseo- pic and open approch [J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2007,42 (6): 939-942.
  • 8P. Cervini, L.C. Smith, D.R. Urbach. The surgeon on call is a strong f- actor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectom- y[J]. 2002,16(12): 1774-1777.
  • 9Sweeney K J, Keane FB. Moving from open to laparoscopicappendicect- omy[J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2003,90(3):257-258.
  • 10S Sauerland, R Lefering, E Neugebauer. Laparoseopic versus open sur- gery for suspected appendicitis[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004,4:CD001546.

共引文献173

同被引文献73

引证文献11

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部