期刊文献+

单纯腓骨高位截骨术与关节冲洗清理联合腓骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较

Comparative analysis of the effect of simple high cut of fibula and arthroscopic lavage debridement combined with fibular osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较单纯腓骨高位截骨术与关节冲洗清理结合腓骨高位截骨术在治疗膝骨关节炎的短、长期疗效。方法回顾性分析45例膝骨关节炎患者的临床资料并根据手术方式进行分组,其中行单纯腓骨截骨术患者23例(对照组);行关节清理冲洗结合腓骨高位截骨术患者22例(观察组)。比较两组患者术前及随访术后3、6、12个月的 VAS 评分和 AKS 膝关节评分。结果对照组与观察组术后3个月 VAS 评分和AKS 评分分别为(4.13±0.76)分、(3.45±0.60)分和(107.04±21.53)分、(126.64±14.24)分,观察组优于对照组(t =3.32、-3.62,均 P <0.05);而两组术后6个月的 VAS 评分和 AKS 评分分别为(2.70±0.64)分、(2.70±0.73)分和(141.17±12.57)分、(146.45±7.26)分,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t =0.51、-1.72,均P >0.05);术后12个月的 VAS 评分和 AKS 评分分别为(2.43±0.79)分、(2.41±0.85)分和(148.26±5.81)分、(148.59±5.53)分,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t =0.11、-0.20,均 P >0.05)。结论单纯腓骨截骨术对患者创伤小、花费少、手术难度小、并且长期临床疗效并不低于关节冲洗联合腓骨截骨术,故应在基层医院广泛开展。 Objective To compare the short and long term effect of knee osteoarthritis treatment with two therapeutic methods which are simple high cut of fibula and arthroscopic lavage debridement combined with fibular osteotomy.Methods Data of 45 consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis were retrospectively observed and selected,and then they were divided into two groups according to the operation method.23 patients with simple high cut of fibula were selected as the control group,and 22 patients with arthroscopic lavage debridement combined with fibular osteotomy were selected as the observation group.Results The VAS and AKS scores of the control group at the time of 3m,6m,1 2m were (4.1 3 ±0.76)points,(1 07.04 ±21 .53)points;(2.70 ±0.64)points,(1 41 .1 7 ±1 2.57)points;(2.43 ±0.79)points,(1 48.26 ±5.81 )points;and the scores of the observation group were (3.45 ± 0.60)points,(1 26.64 ±1 4.24)points,(2.70 ±0.73)points,(1 46.45 ±7.26)points,(2.41 ±0.85)points and (1 48.26 ±5.81 )points.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant at the time of 3 months after surgery(t =3.32,-3.62,all P 〈0.05),the effect of observation group was better than the control group;but the other indices had no statistically significant differences (t =0.51 ,-1 .72,0.1 1 ,-0.20,all P 〉0.05 ). Conclusion The simple high cut of fibula with small trauma,less cost,less surgical difficulty,and long -term clini-cal curative effect is not less than the arthroscopic lavage and debridement combined with fibular osteotomy.There-fore,it should be carried out in the primary hospitals widely.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2015年第24期3777-3780,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 骨关节炎 腓骨 截骨术 关节镜 冲洗 Osteoarthritis Fibula Osteotomy Arthroscopic Lavage
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1陈伟,吕红芝,张晓琳,殷兵,刘松,张英泽.中国中老年人群膝关节骨性关节炎患病率流行病学调查设计[J].河北医科大学学报,2015,36(4):487-490. 被引量:123
  • 2Roos EM, Juhl CB. Osteoarthritis 2012 year in review: rehabilita- tion and outcomes [ J ]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2012,20 ( 12 ) : 1477 -1483.
  • 3李存祥,贾素华,王健,赵飞,李建涛,郑彦华,赵彦铭,王宏艳,张少坤,张保申,柳俊其,刘兰泽.单纯腓骨截断术治疗膝骨关节炎临床研究[J].中国医学创新,2010,7(2):115-117. 被引量:65
  • 4Grilo RM ,Treves R,Preux PM, et al. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions [ J ]. Joint Bone Spine,2007,74(4) :358-361.
  • 5Mowat AG, Nichols PJ, Hollings EM, et al. A comparison of fol- low-up regimes in rheumatoid arthritis [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 19813,39(1) :1~2-'t7.
  • 6严广斌.膝关节评分标准[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(6):78-78. 被引量:119
  • 7Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, et al. The reliability of the Amer- ican Knee Society Score [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2000,71 ( 6 ) :603-608.
  • 8Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Ratlona]e of the Knee Society elinieal rating system [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989,248 ( 6 ) : 13-14.
  • 9胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学.4版[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012:1676.1679.
  • 10盛林,翁习生,林进,金今.全膝关节置换50例:放置引流的随机对照比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(26):5043-5046. 被引量:8

二级参考文献52

  • 1胡孙君,俞光荣.腓骨切除后对踝关节稳定性的影响[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(1):66-68. 被引量:10
  • 2马学东,金群华.宁夏回族不同人群膝骨性关节炎X片比较研究[J].宁夏医学杂志,2007,29(5):408-410. 被引量:8
  • 3陆宸照 曲克服 等.从外踝在踝关节稳定中的作用探讨腓骨切除问题[J].中华骨科杂志,1983,3:157-160.
  • 4Grogan T J, Dorey F, Rollins J, et al. Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty. Ten-year experience at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(2):226-234.
  • 5Johnson DP, Bannister GC. The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(2):289-291.
  • 6Cerise E J, Pierce WA, Diamond DL. Abdominal drains: their role as a source of infection following splenectomy. Ann Surg. 1970; 171(5):764-769.
  • 7Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, et al. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 ;(264):232-234.
  • 8Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, et al. Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study of 90 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(5):475-478.
  • 9Buckwalter JA, Lohmander S. Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(9):1405-1418.
  • 10Heck DA,Robinson RL,Partridge CM, et al. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(356): 93-110,.

共引文献648

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部