期刊文献+

相对湿度对间歇性偏热环境下肉鸡体温、酸碱平衡及生产性能的影响 被引量:17

Effects of Environmental Relative Humidity at Intermittent Partial Heat Environment on Body Temperature,Acid-Base Balance and Performance of Broilers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验旨在研究相对湿度(RH)对间歇性偏热环境下肉鸡体温、酸碱平衡及生产性能的影响。试验采用2个偏热水平(26和31℃)和3个RH水平(30%、60%和85%)的2×3因子设计。选取22日龄爱拔益加(AA)肉鸡360只转入环境控制舱,随机分成6组(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ和Ⅵ组),每组6个重复,每个重复10只鸡(公母各5只)。预试期7 d,温度21℃,RH 60%。正试期14 d,从29日龄开始,每天10:00—16:00(6 h),Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ组鸡舍环境维持26℃,RH分别为30%、60%和85%;Ⅳ、Ⅴ和Ⅵ组维持31℃,RH分别为30%、60%和85%,剩余时间环境温湿度与预试期相同。结果表明:1)Ⅱ组肉鸡的平均日采食量(ADFI)、平均日增重(ADG)最高,Ⅵ组肉鸡ADFI、ADG最低,各组间料重比(F/G)没有显著的差异(P>0.05)。2)第1、3和10天,Ⅵ组肉鸡的体核温度和皮温最高,Ⅲ组肉鸡的皮温高于Ⅰ和Ⅱ组;第1天,Ⅱ组肉鸡体核温度显著低于Ⅰ和Ⅲ组(P<0.05),第3和10天,Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。3)Ⅱ组肉鸡血气中p H和氧分压(p O2)显著低于其他各组(P<0.05),各组二氧化碳分压(p CO2)无显著差异(P>0.05)。由此可见,间歇性偏热环境下(26和31℃),高湿(85%)和低湿(30%)都影响肉鸡的体温、酸碱平衡及生产性能,且不同偏热环境下RH对肉鸡的影响程度不同。 The study was conducted to investigate the effects of relative humidity( 30%,60% and 85%) on body temperature,acid-base balance and performance of Arbor Acres( AA) broilers at intermittent partial heat( 26,31 ℃) environments. A total of three hundred and sixty 22-day-old AA broilers were allotted into environment chambers,and randomly divided into 6 groups( groups Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ and Ⅵ),each group( chamber) contained six cages with ten birds per cage( with five males and five females),and each cage as a replicate. The pre-test period lasted for 7 days and broilers were kept at 21 ℃ and 60% relative humidity. The trial lasted for 14 days. When broilers were 29-day-old,the temperature of groups Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were at 26 ℃,regulating the relative humidity to 30%,60%,85%,respectively; the temperature of Ⅳ,Ⅴ,Ⅵ group were at 31℃,while regulating the relative humidity to 30%,60%,85%,respectively. And the temperature and relative humidity of groups were kept six hours each day,at 10: 00—16: 00,after the period,broilers were kept at 21 ℃and 60% relative humidity. The results showed as follows: 1) average daily food intake( ADFI),average daily gain( ADG) in group Ⅱ were the highest among 6 groups. ADFI and ADG in group Ⅵ were the lowest. No significant difference of feed to gain ratio( F / G) was found among the groups( P〈0. 05). 2) On days 1,3 and10,core temperature and skin temperature in group Ⅵ were the highest among 6 groups,and skin temperature in group Ⅲ was higher than that in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ( P〈0. 05). On day 1,core temperature in group Ⅱshowed significantly lower than that in groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ( P〈0. 05). On days 3 and 10,there was no significant difference among groups Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ( P〉0. 05). 3) The p H and oxygen pressure( p O2) in group Ⅱ were significantly lower than those in other groups( P〈0. 05),and no significant difference of carbon dioxide( p CO2) was found among the groups( P〈0. 05). In conclusion,at the intermittent partial heat environment of 26,31 ℃,compared with 60% relative humidity,85% and 30% relative humidity can change the body temperature,acidbalance and performance of broilers. And relative humidity may affect broilers to varying degrees at different partial heat environments.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期3726-3735,共10页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题“畜禽健康养殖环境控制关键技术与集成”(2012BAD39B02) 中国农业科学院科技创新团队项目(ASTIP-IAS07)
关键词 相对湿度 间歇偏热环境 体温 酸碱平衡 生产性能 肉鸡 relative humidity intermittent partial heat environment body temperature acid-base balance per formance broilers
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1LU Q,WEN J,ZHANG H.Effect of chronic heat exposure on fat deposition and meat quality in two genetic types of chicken[J]. Poultry Science,2007,86(6):1059-1064.
  • 2NIU Z Y,LIU F Z,YAN Q L,et al.Effects of different levels of vitamin E on growth performance and immune responses of broilers under heat stress[J]. Poultry Science,2009,88(10):2101-2107.
  • 3DEEB N,CAHANER A.Genotype-by-environment interaction with broiler genotypes differing in growth rate.1.The effects of high ambient temperature and naked-neck genotype on lines differing in genetic background[J]. Poultry Science,2001,80(6):695-702.
  • 4LIN H M,JIAO H C,BUYSE J,et al.Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry[J]. World's Poultry Science Journal,2006,62(1):71-85.
  • 5AL-FATAFTAH A-R A,ABU-DIEYEH Z H M.Effect of chronic heat stress on broiler performance in Jordan[J]. International Journal of Poultry Science,2007,6(1):64-70.
  • 6SOHAIL M U,HUME M E,BYRD J A,et al.Effect of supplementation of prebiotic mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic mixture on growth performance of broilers subjected to chronic heat stress[J]. Poultry Science,2012,91(9):2235-2240.
  • 7WEBSTER M D,KING J R.Temperature and humidity dynamics of cutaneous and respiratory evaporation in pigeons,Columba livia[J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology B,1987,157(2):253-260.
  • 8MARDER J,ARAD Z.Panting and acid-base regulation in heat stressed birds[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Physiology,1989,94(3):395-400.
  • 9PRINCE R P,WHITAKER J H,MATTERSON L D,et al.Response of chickens to temperature and relative humidity environment[J]. Poultry Science,1965,44(1):73-77.
  • 10FREEMAN B M.The domestic fowl in biomedical research:physiological effects of the environment[J]. World's Poultry Science Journal,1988,44(1):41-60.

二级参考文献36

共引文献52

同被引文献148

引证文献17

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部