期刊文献+

工作场所欺凌:商务企业与卫生事业单位员工的比较

Workplace Bullying: Comparison between Staff of Commercial Enterprises and Health Service Institutes
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]了解商务企业与卫生事业单位员工工作场所欺凌的现况,并比较二者差异。[方法]选择上海某区2座商务楼企业员工847人及社区卫生服务中心员工146人进行问卷调查。问卷内容包括基本信息、工作特征及工作场所欺凌情况等。工作场所欺凌采用自我标签法和行为测量法测量:前一方法在给出定义的基础上,测量受试者近6个月遭受工作场所欺凌的主观认知;后一方法运用负性行为问卷-修订版问卷(NAQ-R)测量受试者近6个月内遭受负性行为的频率。[结果]两类人群分别回收有效问卷397份(46.87%)、89份(60.96%)。NAQ-R在本调查中的Cronbach’α系数分别为0.978、0.965;NAQ-R总分与自我标签法得分的相关系数为0.494(P<0.001)。自我标签法测得两类人群工作场所欺凌率分别为23.0%、14.6%;NAQ-R测得工作场所欺凌率分别为13.1%、5.6%。商务企业单位工作场所欺凌率高于卫生事业单位(P<0.001)。[结论]商务企业员工的工作场所欺凌问题较卫生事业单位严重。 [Objective] To assess and compare the prevalence of workplace bullying among staff of commercial enterprises and health service institutes. [Methods]A total of 847 employees in two commercial buildings and 146 employees at one community health service center were invited to a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire contained general demographic information, job characteristics, and workplace bullying. Workplace bullying was assessed by self-labeling method(participants were given a single-item question that whether or not they had been bullied within recent 6 months) and by behavioral experience method using Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised(NAQ-R)(participants were asked to report how frequently they had been exposed to various behaviors listed in the inventory within recent 6 months). [Results] Totally 397(46.87%) and 89(60.96%) valid copies of questionnaires were retrieved from the two populations respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of NAQ-R were 0.978 and 0.965 respectively. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the total NAQ-R score and the self-labeling score was r=0.494(P 〈0.001). Regarding workplace bullying, 23.0% and 14.6% of the employees reported being exposed to bullying in the commercial buildings and the community health service center respectively. According to the NAQ-R, however, the prevalence of bullying in the commercial buildings(13.1%) was higher than that in the health service center(5.6%)(P 〈0.001). [Conclusion] More serious workplace bullying problems are found in the commercial enterprises than in the health service institutes.
出处 《环境与职业医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期1136-1141,共6页 Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词 工作场所 欺凌 负性行为问卷 流行率 现况研究 workplace bullying Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised prevalence cross-sectional study
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Tsuno K, Kawakami N, Inoue A, et al. Assessing workplace bullying: Reliability and validity of the japanese version of the negative acts questionnaire [ J ]. J Occup Health, 2010, 52 (4): 216-226.
  • 2Keashly L. Interpersonal and systemic aspects of emotional abuse at work: The target's perspective [ J ]. Violence Vict, 2001, 16( 3 ): 233-268.
  • 3Einarsen S. Harassment and bullying at work : A review of the Scandinavian approach[ J ]. Aggress Violent Behav, 2000, 5 (4): 379-401.
  • 4Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised[ J ]. Work Stress, 2009, 23( 1 ): 24-44.
  • 5Mikkelsen E G, Einarsen S. Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates [ J ]. Eur J Work Organ Psychol, 2001, 10(4): 393413.
  • 6李永鑫,张璐.护士工作场所中的欺负行为及与工作倦怠、工作满意度、健康的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24(8):625-628. 被引量:29
  • 7荀洪景,蔡蓉,刘化侠.临床护士遭遇工作场所欺负状况调查[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2013,28(9):59-61. 被引量:21
  • 8Leymann H. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces [ J ]. ViolenceVict, 1990, 5( 2 ): 119-126.
  • 9Morten B N, Guy N, Stle E. Measuring exposure to workplace bullying//Cooper C L, Einarsen S, Hoel H. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: De'elopments in theory research and practice[ M ]. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2010: 149-174.
  • 10Einarsen S, Raknes B I. Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men[ J ]. Violence Vict, 1997, 12( 3 ): 247-263.

二级参考文献65

共引文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部