期刊文献+

新闻侵权问题伦理考量的历史与逻辑 被引量:1

The History and Logic of Ethical Consideration on Press Tort
原文传递
导出
摘要 新闻侵权的观念史与法理阐释同时为新闻的合理规制提供了伦理考量的基本框架。作为侵权行为,诽谤或隐私侵犯各有其法律渊源与抗辩原则;作为伦理议题,诽谤与隐私侵犯所涉及的,均为个体的独立自主性与人格完整,名誉强调人格的构成性,隐私强调人格的完成性,两者只是个体人格尊严的不同侧面。基于两种主要新闻侵权行为法理逻辑差异性与相似性的历史探究,本文对新闻实践中公共利益与私人权利的艰难平衡进行了伦理想像。 The history of idea and nomological interpretation of press torts provide us with a basic ethical consideration of reasonable regulations of news practices. As torts,defamation and invasion of privacy have their own legal origins and defense principles; As ethical issues,both defamation and invasion of privacy refer to autonomy and integrity of personalities of individuals,with reputation emphasizing on constitution as while privacy on completeness,which are different aspects of dignity of human personality. Based on the historical inquiry of the differences as well as similarities of the nomological logic of the two major press torts,this paper gives an ethical imagination of the tough balance between public interest and private rights in news practices.
作者 王金礼
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期98-104,共7页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金项目"新媒体视角下的传播伦理研究"(015BXW071)的阶段性成果
关键词 新闻侵权 名誉 隐私 人格完整 新闻伦理 press-tort reputation privacy integrity of personality journalistic ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1张新宝.“新闻(媒体)侵权”否认说[J].中国法学,2008(6):183-189. 被引量:29
  • 2Kalven,Harry Jr."Privacy in Tort Law-Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?"Law and Contemporary Problems,Vol.31(2),1966,pp326-41.
  • 3Bloustein,Edward."Privacy,Tort Law and the Constitution:Is Warren and Brandies'Tort Petty and Uuconstitutional as Well?"Texas Law Review,Vol.46(5),1968,pp.611-29.
  • 4Van Vechten Veeder's"History and Theory of the Law of Defamation(I)",Columbia Law Review,Vol.3(8),1903,p.565.
  • 5Warren,Samuel,and Louis Brandeis."The Right to Privacy",Harvard Law Review,1890,pp.197,197,218.
  • 6See Prosser."Intentional Infliction of Mental Suffering:A New Tort",Michigan Law Review,Vol.37(6),1939,pp.874-92.
  • 7Wade."Tort Liability for Abusive and Insulting Language",Vanderbilt Law Review,Vol.4,1951,pp.63-115.
  • 8Wade."Defamation and the Right of Privacy",Vanderbilt Law Review,Vol.15,1962,pp.1093-125.
  • 9Davis,"What Do We Mean by Right to Privacy",South Dakota Law Review,Vol.4,1959,pp.1 -24.
  • 10Bloustein."Privacy,Tort Law and the Constitution",Texas Law Review,Vol.46,1968,pp.611-29,et al.

二级参考文献1

共引文献28

同被引文献21

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部